Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29955803›Full record

Trial reportJAMA psychiatry2018

Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Treatment-Resistant Major Depression in US Veterans: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jerome A Yesavage, J Kaci Fairchild, Zhibao Mi, Kousick Biswas, Anne Davis-Karim, Ciaran S Phibbs, Steven D Forman, Michael Thase, Leanne M Williams, Amit Etkin and 7 more

5 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 98 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01191333 nacompletednot on this map

CSP #556 - The Effectiveness of rTMS in Depressed VA Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2012 to 2017Enrolled164ConditionsMajor Depressive DisorderArmsrTMS, Sham Device
NCT02990793 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Double Blind, Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Clinical Trial to Evaluate The Safety And Efficacy Of Biometrics-Guided Magnetic EEG Resonance Therapy (MeRT) Treatment Of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorWave NeuroscienceRan2022 to 2025Enrolled158ConditionsPostTraumatic Stress Disorder, Traumatic Brain Injury, Postconcussive SymptomsArmsActive MeRT Treatment, Sham MeRT Treatment
NCT03208049 nacompletednot on this map

Predictors of Response to Insomnia Treatments for Gulf War Veterans

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2017 to 2023Enrolled50ConditionsInsomniaArmsBehavioral Therapy (BT), Cognitive Therapy (CT)
NCT06081309 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Electroencephalogram (EEG) Personalized Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (eTMS) for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorWave NeuroscienceRan2023 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticArmsEEG-based personalized TMS
NCT06892028 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Electroencephalogram (EEG) Personalized Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (eTMS) for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorWave NeuroscienceRan2025 to 2026Enrolled110ConditionsStress Disorder, Post TraumaticArmsEEG-based personalized TMS, Sham Comparator
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression in adolescents: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Trial
  20. Trial

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jerome A YesavageDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Sierra-Pacific Mental Illness Research Educational and Clinical Center, Palo Alto, California.
J Kaci FairchildDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Sierra-Pacific Mental Illness Research Educational and Clinical Center, Palo Alto, California.
Zhibao MiDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Perry Point, Maryland.
Kousick BiswasDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Perry Point, Maryland.
Anne Davis-KarimDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Cooperative Studies Program Pharmacy Coordinating Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Ciaran S PhibbsDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Health Economics Resource Center and Center for Implementation to Innovation, Palo Alto, California.
Steven D FormanDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Michael ThaseDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Leanne M WilliamsDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Sierra-Pacific Mental Illness Research Educational and Clinical Center, Palo Alto, California.
Amit EtkinDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Sierra-Pacific Mental Illness Research Educational and Clinical Center, Palo Alto, California.
Ruth O'HaraDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Sierra-Pacific Mental Illness Research Educational and Clinical Center, Palo Alto, California.
Gerald GeorgetteDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Sierra-Pacific Mental Illness Research Educational and Clinical Center, Palo Alto, California.
Tamara BealeDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Sierra-Pacific Mental Illness Research Educational and Clinical Center, Palo Alto, California.
Grant D HuangDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Cooperative Studies Program Central Office, Washington, DC.
Art NodaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Mark S GeorgeDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, South Carolina.
VA Cooperative Studies Program Study Team
Stanford University · USThe Coordinating Center · USVeterans Health Administration · USNeurosciences Institute · USRalph H. Johnson VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Stanford Medicine Center for Longevity and Healthy Aging Research Education CoreP30AG059307 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PERIYAKOIL, VYJEYANTHI S, YESAVAGE, JEROME A · 2018 to 2025
$4.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG059307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Treatment-resistant major depression (TRMD) in veterans is a major clinical challenge given the high risk for suicidality in these patients. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) offers the potential for a novel treatment modality for these veterans. Objective: To determine the efficacy of rTMS in the treatment of TRMD in veterans. Design, Setting, and Participants: A double-blind, sham-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted from September 1, 2012, to December 31, 2016, in 9 Veterans Affairs medical centers. A total of 164 veterans with TRD participated. Interventions: Participants were randomized to either left prefrontal rTMS treatment (10 Hz, 120% motor threshold, 4000 pulses/session) or to sham (control) rTMS treatment for up to 30 treatment sessions. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary dependent measure of the intention-to-treat analysis was remission rate (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score ≤10, indicating that depression is in remission and not a clinically significant burden), and secondary analyses were conducted on other indices of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, hopelessness, suicidality, and quality of life. Results: The 164 participants had a mean (SD) age of 55.2 (12.4) years, 132 (80.5%) were men, and 126 (76.8%) were of white race. Of these, 81 were randomized to receive active rTMS and 83 to receive sham. For the primary analysis of remission, there was no significant effect of treatment (odds ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.59-2.26; P = .67). At the end of the acute treatment phase, 33 of 81 (40.7%) of those in the active treatment group achieved remission of depressive symptoms compared with 31 of 83 (37.4%) of those in the sham treatment group. Overall, 64 of 164 (39.0%) of the participants achieved remission. Conclusions and Relevance: A total of 39.0% of the veterans who participated in this trial experienced clinically significant improvement resulting in remission of depressive symptoms; however, there was no evidence of difference in remission rates between the active and sham treatments. These findings may reflect the importance of close clinical surveillance, rigorous monitoring of concomitant medication, and regular interaction with clinic staff in bringing about significant improvement in this treatment-resistant population. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01191333.

Indexed as

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantQuality of LifeSuicideSuicide PreventionAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticTranscranial Magnetic StimulationTreatment OutcomeUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29955803
PMCPMC6142912
OpenAlexW2810982934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.