Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29955801›Full record

Observational studyJAMA surgery2018

Characteristics and Outcomes of Surgical Patients With Solid Cancers Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.

Kathryn Puxty, Philip McLoone, Tara Quasim, Billy Sloan, John Kinsella, David S Morrison

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Intensive care unit outcomes and prognostic factors of colorectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [With a tumor diagnosis in the intensive care unit].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [Cancer patients in the intensive care unit].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kathryn PuxtyDepartment of Intensive Care, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Philip McLooneInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Tara QuasimSchool of Medicine, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Billy SloanInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
John KinsellaSchool of Medicine, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
David S MorrisonConsultant in Public Health Medicine, National Health Services Scotland, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16662Cancer Research UK C47114/A16662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Within the surgical population admitted to intensive care units (ICUs), cancer is a common condition. However, clinicians can be reluctant to admit patients with cancer to ICUs owing to concerns about survival. Objective: To compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of surgical patients with and without cancer who are admitted to ICUs. Design, Setting, and Participants: An observational retrospective cohort study using ICU audit records linked to hospitalization discharge summaries, cancer registrations, and death records of all 16 general adult ICUs in the West of Scotland was conducted. All 25 017 surgical ICU admissions between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2011, were included, and data analysis was conducted during that time. Exposures: Patients were dichotomized based on a diagnosis of a solid malignant tumor as determined by its documentation in the Scottish Cancer Registry within the 2 years prior to ICU admission. Main Outcomes and Measures: Intensive care unit patients with cancer were compared with ICU patients without cancer in terms of patient characteristics (age, sex, severity of illness, reason for admission, and organ support) and survival (ICU, hospital, 6 months, and 4 years). Results: Within the 25 017 surgical ICU patients, 13 684 (54.7%) were male, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 64 (50-74), and 5462 (21.8%) had an underlying solid tumor diagnosis. Patients with cancer were older (median [IQR] age, 68 [60-76] vs 62 [45-74] years; P < .001) with a higher proportion of elective hospitalizations (60.5% vs 19.8%; P < .001), similar Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores (median for both, 17), but lower use of multiorgan support (57.9% vs 66.7%; P < .001). Intensive care unit and hospital mortality were lower for the cancer group, at 12.2% (95% CI, 11.3%-13.1%) vs 16.8% (95% CI, 16.3%-17.4%) (P < .001) and 22.9% (95% CI, 21.8%-24.1%) vs 28.1% (27.4%-28.7%) (P < .001). Patients with cancer had an adjusted odds ratio for hospital mortality of 1.09 (95% CI, 1.00-1.19). By 6 months, mortality in the cancer group was higher than that in the noncancer group at 31.3% compared with 28.2% (P < .001). Four years after ICU admission, mortality for those with and without cancer was 60.9% vs 39.7% (P < .001) respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Cancer is a common diagnosis among surgical ICU patients and this study suggests that initial outcomes compare favorably with those of ICU patients with other conditions. Consideration that a diagnosis of cancer should not preclude admission to the ICU in patients with surgical disease is suggested.

Indexed as

Neoplasm StagingSurgical Procedures, OperativeAgedFemaleHospitalizationHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOutcome Assessment, Health CareRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsScotlandSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID29955801
PMCPMC6233642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.