Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29955666›Full record

ReviewAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)2018

Digital technologies as biomarkers, clinical outcomes assessment, and recruitment tools in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials.

Michael Gold, Joan Amatniek, Maria C Carrillo, Jesse M Cedarbaum, James A Hendrix, Bradley B Miller, Julie M Robillard, J Jeremy Rice, Holly Soares, Maria B Tome and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Michael GoldAbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Joan AmatniekOtsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA.
Maria C CarrilloAlzheimer's Association, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jesse M CedarbaumBiogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.
James A HendrixAlzheimer's Association, Chicago, IL, USA.
Bradley B MillerEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Julie M RobillardDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia and Children's and Women's Hospital and Health Centres, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
J Jeremy RiceHealthcare and Life Science Research, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, New York, NY, USA.
Holly SoaresAbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Maria B TomeEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA), London, UK.
Ioannis TarnanasAltoida Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA.
Gabriel VargasEarly Development, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Lisa J BainIndependent Science Writer, Elverson, PA, USA.
Sara J CzajaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital technology is transforming the development of drugs for Alzheimer's disease and was the topic of the Alzheimer's Association's Research Roundtable on its May 23-24, 2017 meeting. Research indicates that wearable devices and unobtrusive passive sensors that enable the collection of frequent or continuous, objective, and multidimensional data during daily activities may capture subtle changes in cognition and functional capacity long before the onset of dementia. The potential to exploit these technologies to improve clinical trials as both recruitment and retention tools as well as for potential end points was discussed. The implications for the collection and use of large amounts of data, lessons learned from other related disease areas, ethical concerns raised by these new technologies, and regulatory issues were also covered in the meeting. Finally, the challenges and opportunities of these new technologies for future use were discussed.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseBiomarkersClinical trialsCognitionDigital technologyFunction

Identifiers

PMID29955666
PMCPMC6021547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.