ArticleBone reports2018
Denosumab significantly improves lumbar spine bone mineral density more in treatment-naïve than in long-term bisphosphonate-treated patients.
Article in Bone reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Denosumab-efficacy, safety, persistence and sequential strategies-a systematic review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Review
- One-year bone mineral density gains with anti-osteoporotic medications and clinical factors associated with non-BMD gainers.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2025Article
- Risk factors for poor response to denosumab treatment in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2022Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of our study was to compare the skeletal responses to 3-year denosumab treatment in bisphosphonate (BP)-naïve and long-term BP-treated patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Female patients who were BP treatment-naïve (treatment-naïve group: 25 cases) or who received long-term BPs (BP pre-treated group: 24 cases) were compared for serum bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP)-5b, and urinary N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX) at baseline and at 4, 8, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, and 36 months of denosumab therapy. Lumbar 1-4 (L) spine bone mineral density (BMD), total hip (H)-BMD, and femoral neck (FN)-BMD values were measured at baseline and at 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months. The percentage changes of bone turnover markers were significantly decreased throughout the study period by a larger margin in the treatment-naïve group than in the BP pre-treated group. L-BMD, H-BMD, and FN-BMD were all significantly increased in the treatment-naïve and BP pre-treated groups at 36 months (12.9% and 7.5%, 5.9% and 6.0%, and 7.6% and 4.5%, respectively), compared with pre-treatment levels. There were significant differences for L-BMD at 12, 24, 30, and 36 months between the groups. Our findings suggest that the BMD response to denosumab, especially that of L-BMD, was diminished following BP therapy relative to treatment-naïve patients, thus providing evidence supporting the use of denosumab as a first-line therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.