ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2018
Risk Factors for Viridans Group Streptococcal Bacteremia in Neutropenic and Non-neutropenic Patients: A Single Center Case-Case-Control Study.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and genomic features of mitis group streptococcal bacteremia in patients with febrile neutropenia.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- No Stone Left Unturned: A Rare Case of Viridans Strep Bacteremia Secondary to Choledocholithiasis.Cureus · 2025Article
- The clinical Spectrum of Viridans Group Streptococci infections in paediatric patients at a tertiary hospital.Southern African journal of infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Review
- Infections in Hospitalized Cancer Patients.World journal of oncology · 2021Review
- Clinical Outcomes of Ceftriaxone vs Penicillin G for Complicated Viridans Group Streptococci Bacteremia.Open forum infectious diseases · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundViridans group streptococcal (VGS) bacteremia is common among neutropenic patients. Although VGS bacteremia occurs in non-neutropenic patients, risk factors are not well established. We conducted a case-case-control study to identify risk factors for VGS among neutropenic and non-neutropenic patients.
methodsPatients with VGS bacteremia between January 2009 and December 2014 in our 200-bed clinical research hospital were identified using microbiology records. Neutropenic and non-neutropenic patients at the time of positive culture were matched 1:1 to controls on the basis of neutrophil count (ANC), ward, and length of stay. We extracted demographic, laboratory, medication, and other clinical data from chart reviews. Data were analyzed using McNemar's test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and conditional logistic regression modeling.
resultsAmong 101 patients, 63 were neutropenic and 38 non-neutropenic at the time of VGS bacteremia. In multivariable analysis of neutropenic patients, only lower ANC predicted VGS bacteremia (odds ratio [OR], 0.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.59;
conclusionsOnly lower ANC nadir increased the risk for VGS bacteremia in the neutropenic group, and vancomycin was protective. Other previously described factors (chemotherapy, radiation, oral conditions) related to neutropenia were not independently associated with VGS bacteremia. No tested clinical factors predicted infection in the non-neutropenic group. Our results suggest that VGS bacteremia should be anticipated when making antimicrobial choices in profoundly neutropenic patients, and merit further exploration in non-neutropenic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.