Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29955604›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2018

Modeling Renal Disease "On the Fly".

Cassandra Millet-Boureima, Jessica Porras Marroquin, Chiara Gamberi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Tau Regulates Endoreplication inmicroPublication biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The Genetics of Diabetes: What We Can Learn fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Empowering Melatonin Therapeutics withDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Frontiers in physiology · 2021
    Review
  11. Cyst Reduction by Melatonin in a NovelMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Drug screening in Drosophila; why, when, and when not?Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cassandra Millet-BoureimaBiology Department, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jessica Porras MarroquinBiology Department, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Chiara GamberiBiology Department, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7122-6491

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detoxification is a fundamental function for all living organisms that need to excrete catabolites and toxins to maintain homeostasis. Kidneys are major organs of detoxification that maintain water and electrolyte balance to preserve physiological functions of vertebrates. In insects, the renal function is carried out by Malpighian tubules and nephrocytes. Due to differences in their circulation, the renal systems of mammalians and insects differ in their functional modalities, yet carry out similar biochemical and physiological functions and share extensive genetic and molecular similarities. Evolutionary conservation can be leveraged to model specific aspects of the complex mammalian kidney function in the genetic powerhouse

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalDrosophila melanogasterKidney DiseasesAnimalsDrosophila ProteinsHumansKidneyMalpighian TubulesDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29955604
PMCPMC6000847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.