Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29955545›Full record

ArticleThe mental health clinician2018

Overcoming barriers to monitoring patients taking second-generation antipsychotics.

Anita Peña, Beth DeJongh, Matthew Haas, Michelle Harms

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The mental health clinician, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Most Second-Generation Antipsychotic Prescriptions in Community Practice Are Neither FDA-Approved nor Within Prescribing Guideline Recommendations.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anita PeñaClinical Pharmacist, Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, apena0206@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6318-7798
Beth DeJonghMental Health Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Clement J. Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice, Concordia University Wisconsin School of Pharmacy, Mequon, Wisconsin.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0964-3788
Matthew HaasMental Health Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Clement J. Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7316-3378
Michelle HarmsMental Health Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Clement J. Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4915-6810
Milwaukee VA Medical Center · USAurora Health Care · USConcordia University Wisconsin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients taking second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are at increased risk of developing metabolic syndrome because of the side effect profiles of these medications. A medication use evaluation (MUE) was conducted and showed that baseline monitoring rates of metabolic parameters in patients taking SGAs are low. A pharmacist-run metabolic syndrome monitoring clinic (MSMC) is available to mental health (MH) outpatients; however, the clinic is underused by providers. The purpose of this project was to increase baseline metabolic syndrome monitoring rates in patients taking SGAs by implementing interventions to overcome barriers to monitoring and to accessing the MSMC.

methodsAppropriate tools to improve monitoring were obtained, and an electronic consult for the MSMC was created. A presentation and pamphlet were developed to improve awareness. Information about free patient transportation was obtained and distributed. Efficacy was assessed by evaluating patient referrals to the clinic before and after intervention, comparing baseline monitoring rates after implementation with the MUE data, and administering an anonymous survey to outpatient MH providers.

resultsThere was a 37.5% increase in overall referral rates to the MSMC after intervention, but only 51.5% of patients attended appointments as scheduled. Monitoring of vital signs increased, but monitoring of laboratory parameters decreased. A total of 60% (9 of 15) of providers completed a survey, of which one third indicated they still forget to refer patients to the MSMC. DISCUSSION: Overall, baseline metabolic monitoring rates remained low despite implementing several interventions. Patient and provider outreach is crucial for initiating and maintaining a successful metabolic monitoring system for patients taking SGAs.

Indexed as

metabolic syndromemetabolic syndrome monitoring clinicmonitoring ratespharmacistsecond-generation antipsychotics

Identifiers

PMID29955545
PMCPMC6007736
OpenAlexW2791858961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.