ArticleScientific reports2018
Optimal integration of actions and their visual effects is based on both online and prior causality evidence.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Timing of responses to gradual and abrupt visuo-proprioceptive cue conflict with and without feedback.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- On the Role of Interoception in Body and Object Perception: A Multisensory-Integration Account.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023Article
- Cumulative multisensory discrepancies shape the ventriloquism aftereffect but not the ventriloquism bias.PloS one · 2023Article
- Perceptual changes after learning of an arbitrary mapping between vision and hand movements.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Conscious awareness of a visuo-proprioceptive mismatch: Effect on cross-sensory recalibration.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Visuo-proprioceptive integration and recalibration with multiple visual stimuli.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- On the relevance of task instructions for the influence of action on perception.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021Article
- Impact of proprioception on the perceived size and distance of external objects in a virtual action task.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2021Article
- Design choices: Empirical recommendations for designing two-dimensional finger-tracking experiments.Behavior research methods · 2020Article
- Exploring the time window for causal inference and the multisensory integration of actions and their visual effects.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
- Spatial action-effect binding depends on type of action-effect transformation.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2020Article
- Explicit knowledge of sensory non-redundancy can reduce the strength of multisensory integration.Psychological research · 2020Article
- Suppression of mutually incompatible proprioceptive and visual action effects in tool use.PloS one · 2020Article
- Multisensory integration in virtual interactions with distant objects.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Effects of Hand and Hemispace on Multisensory Integration of Hand Position and Visual Feedback.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Effects of auditory feedback on movements with two-segment sequence and eye-hand coordination.Experimental brain research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The brain needs to identify redundant sensory signals in order to integrate them optimally. The identification process, referred to as causal inference, depends on the spatial and temporal correspondence of the incoming sensory signals ('online sensory causality evidence') as well as on prior expectations regarding their causal relation. We here examine whether the same causal inference process underlies spatial integration of actions and their visual consequences. We used a basic cursor-control task for which online sensory causality evidence is provided by the correlated hand and cursor movements, and prior expectations are formed by everyday experience of such correlated movements. Participants made out-and-back movements and subsequently judged the hand or cursor movement endpoints. In one condition, we omitted the online sensory causality evidence by showing the cursor only at the movement endpoint. The integration strength was lower than in conditions where the cursor was visible during the outward movement, but a substantial level of integration persisted. These findings support the hypothesis that the binding of actions and their visual consequences is based on the general mechanism of optimal integration, and they specifically show that such binding can occur even if it is previous experience only that identifies the action consequence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.