Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29955144›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2018

Validation of a targeted next-generation sequencing approach to detect mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal adenocarcinoma.

David J Papke, Jonathan A Nowak, Matthew B Yurgelun, Alexander Frieden, Amitabh Srivastava, Neal I Lindeman, Lynette M Sholl, Laura E MacConaill, Fei Dong

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Development and evaluation of INTFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  9. Integrative characterization of intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm (ITPN) of the pancreas and associated invasive adenocarcinoma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  10. Clinicopathologic and molecular spectrum of testicular sex cord-stromal tumors not amenable to specific histopathologic subclassification.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Underutilization of Guideline-Recommended Mismatch Repair/Microsatellite Instability Biomarker Testing in Advanced Colorectal Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Molecular assessment of testicular adult granulosa cell tumor demonstrates significant differences when compared to ovarian counterparts.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  16. Cancer discovery · 2021
    Article
  17. Comparative molecular analysis of testicular Leydig cell tumors demonstrates distinct subsets of neoplasms with aggressive histopathologic features.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Molecular Characterization and Therapeutic Targeting of Colorectal Cancers Harboring Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Fusions.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David J PapkeDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jonathan A NowakDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Matthew B YurgelunDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Alexander FriedenDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Amitabh SrivastavaDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Neal I LindemanDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Lynette M ShollDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Laura E MacConaillCenter for Cancer Genome Discovery, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Fei DongDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. fdong1@bwh.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mismatch repair protein deficiency is a hallmark of cancers associated with Lynch syndrome and is a biomarker for response to immunotherapy. With the increasing adoption of cancer next-generation sequencing, there has been a movement to develop screening approaches that take advantage of the unique mutational signatures of mismatch repair-deficient tumors. Here, we develop a sequencing-based metric that distinguishes mismatch repair-deficient from mismatch repair-proficient colorectal adenocarcinomas with comparison to immunohistochemical staining. We find that a single criterion of three or more single base pair insertion or deletion mutations per megabase sequenced, occurring in mononucleotide repeat regions of four or more nucleotides, is sufficient to detect mismatch repair deficiency with 96% sensitivity and 100% specificity in a training set of 241 cancers and 96% sensitivity and 99% specificity in a validation set of 436 additional cancers. Using data from the same cohort, we also find that sequencing information from only three genes-ARID1A, KMT2D, and SOX9-is sufficient to detect mismatch repair-deficient colorectal adenocarcinomas with 76% sensitivity and 98% specificity in the validation set. These findings support the notion that targeted next-generation sequencing already being performed for clinical or research purposes can also be used to accurately detect mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal adenocarcinomas.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedColorectal NeoplasmsColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisDNA Mismatch RepairFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.