Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29955139›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2018

Methanotrophy across a natural permafrost thaw environment.

Caitlin M Singleton, Carmody K McCalley, Ben J Woodcroft, Joel A Boyd, Paul N Evans, Suzanne B Hodgkins, Jeffrey P Chanton, Steve Frolking, Patrick M Crill, Scott R Saleska and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Caitlin M SingletonAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Carmody K McCalleyThomas H. Gosnell School of Life Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA.
Ben J WoodcroftAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0670-7480
Joel A BoydAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Paul N EvansAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Suzanne B HodgkinsDepartment of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Jeffrey P ChantonDepartment of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Steve FrolkingEarth Systems Research Center, Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.
Patrick M CrillDepartment of Geological Sciences and Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Scott R SaleskaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Virginia I RichDepartment of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Gene W TysonAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. g.tyson@uq.edu.au.
The University of Queensland · AUFlorida State University · USRochester Institute of Technology · USStockholm University · SEThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of New Hampshire · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fate of carbon sequestered in permafrost is a key concern for future global warming as this large carbon stock is rapidly becoming a net methane source due to widespread thaw. Methane release from permafrost is moderated by methanotrophs, which oxidise 20-60% of this methane before emission to the atmosphere. Despite the importance of methanotrophs to carbon cycling, these microorganisms are under-characterised and have not been studied across a natural permafrost thaw gradient. Here, we examine methanotroph communities from the active layer of a permafrost thaw gradient in Stordalen Mire (Abisko, Sweden) spanning three years, analysing 188 metagenomes and 24 metatranscriptomes paired with in situ biogeochemical data. Methanotroph community composition and activity varied significantly as thaw progressed from intact permafrost palsa, to partially thawed bog and fully thawed fen. Thirteen methanotroph population genomes were recovered, including two novel genomes belonging to the uncultivated upland soil cluster alpha (USCα) group and a novel potentially methanotrophic Hyphomicrobiaceae. Combined analysis of porewater δ

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyAtmosphereBacteriaCarbonCarbon CycleMetagenomeMetagenomicsMethanePermafrostSwedenTemperatureCarbonMethane

Identifiers

PMID29955139
PMCPMC6155033
OpenAlexW2810888228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.