Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29955073›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Prolonged abstinence from cocaine or morphine disrupts separable valuations during decision conflict.

Brian M Sweis, A David Redish, Mark J Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Neural signatures underlying deliberation in human foraging decisions.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brian M SweisGraduate Program in Neuroscience & Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2123-5824
A David RedishDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. redish@umn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3644-9072
Mark J ThomasDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. tmhomas@umn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5721-5350

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008244 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI SHIMIZU, YOJI · 1988 to 2024
$13.6M
PREDOCTORAL TRAINING OF NEUROSCIENTISTST32GM008471 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI EBNER, TIMOTHY J · 1993 to 2017
$4.9M
Relating episodic memory and episodic future thinking in hippocampusR01MH080318 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI REDISH, A DAVID · 2008 to 2020
$3.7M
Synaptic Plasticity in Animal Models of AddictionR01DA019666 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI THOMAS, MARK JOHN · 2006 to 2016
$3.0M
The covert expectation of reward during deliberationR01DA030672 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI REDISH, A DAVID · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
Probing Neural Circuit Plasticity in Addiction RelapseK02DA035459 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI THOMAS, MARK JOHN · 2013 to 2017
$511k
Optogenetic modulation of decision-making circuitry in mouse models of addictionF30DA043326 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI SWEIS, BRIAN MUSA · 2017 to 2020
$139k
NIDA NIH HHS F30 DA043326NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA019666NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030672NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008244NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008471NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080318U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) T32GM008244U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) T32GM008471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroeconomic theories propose changes in decision making drive relapse in recovering drug addicts, resulting in continued drug use despite stated wishes not to. Such conflict is thought to arise from multiple valuation systems dependent on separable neural components, yet many neurobiology of addiction studies employ only simple tests of value. Here, we tested in mice how prolonged abstinence from different drugs affects behavior in a neuroeconomic foraging task that reveals multiple tests of value. Abstinence from repeated cocaine and morphine disrupts separable decision-making processes. Cocaine alters deliberation-like behavior prior to choosing a preferred though economically unfavorable offer, while morphine disrupts re-evaluations after rapid initial decisions. These findings suggest that different drugs have long-lasting effects precipitating distinct decision-making vulnerabilities. Our approach can guide future refinement of decision-making behavioral paradigms and highlights how grossly similar behavioral maladaptations may mask multiple underlying, parallel, and dissociable processes that treatments for addiction could potentially target.

Indexed as

Conflict, PsychologicalAnimalsBehavior, AddictiveCocaineCocaine-Related DisordersDecision MakingMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMorphineCocaineMorphine

Identifiers

PMID29955073
PMCPMC6023899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.