Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29955046›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Go/No-Go task engagement enhances population representation of target stimuli in primary auditory cortex.

Sophie Bagur, Martin Averseng, Diego Elgueda, Stephen David, Jonathan Fritz, Pingbo Yin, Shihab Shamma, Yves Boubenec, Srdjan Ostojic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Similar Response Dynamics Represent Opposite Behaviors and Rewards in the Frontal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The cingulate cortex facilitates auditory perception under challenging listening conditions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sophie BagurBrain Plasticity Unit, Équipe MOBS, CNRS UMR 8249, École Supérieure de Physique et de Chimie Industrielles de la Ville de Paris, 10 rue Vauquelin, 75005, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4375-1838
Martin AversengLaboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs, Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University, CNRS, 29 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France.
Diego ElguedaNeural Systems Laboratory, Institute for Systems Research & Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Maryland in College Park, 2202 A.V. Williams Building, College Park, MD 20742, MD, USA.
Stephen DavidLaboratory of Brain, Hearing and Behavior, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239-3098, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4135-3104
Jonathan FritzNeural Systems Laboratory, Institute for Systems Research & Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Maryland in College Park, 2202 A.V. Williams Building, College Park, MD 20742, MD, USA.
Pingbo YinNeural Systems Laboratory, Institute for Systems Research & Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Maryland in College Park, 2202 A.V. Williams Building, College Park, MD 20742, MD, USA.
Shihab ShammaLaboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs, Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University, CNRS, 29 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France.
Yves BoubenecLaboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs, Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University, CNRS, 29 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France. boubenec@ens.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0106-6947
Srdjan OstojicLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives, INSERM U960, École Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University, 29 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France. srdjan.ostojic@ens.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7473-1223

Funding

Top-down control of auditory processing in the cortico-collicular network (Administrative Supplement)R01DC014950 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID, STEPHEN V · 2016 to 2025
$3.5M
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02 PSL*Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) ANR-10-LABX-0087 IECEC | European Research Council (ERC) ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02 PSL*
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary sensory cortices are classically considered to extract and represent stimulus features, while association and higher-order areas are thought to carry information about stimulus meaning. Here we show that this information can in fact be found in the neuronal population code of the primary auditory cortex (A1). A1 activity was recorded in awake ferrets while they either passively listened or actively discriminated stimuli in a range of Go/No-Go paradigms, with different sounds and reinforcements. Population-level dimensionality reduction techniques reveal that task engagement induces a shift in stimulus encoding from a sensory to a behaviorally driven representation that specifically enhances the target stimulus in all paradigms. This shift partly relies on task-engagement-induced changes in spontaneous activity. Altogether, we show that A1 population activity bears strong similarities to frontal cortex responses. These findings indicate that primary sensory cortices implement a crucial change in the structure of population activity to extract task-relevant information during behavior.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory CortexAvoidance LearningChoice BehaviorConditioning, ClassicalElectrodes, ImplantedFemaleFerretsFrontal LobeMultifactor Dimensionality ReductionNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsPattern Recognition, PhysiologicalReinforcement, PsychologyStereotaxic Techniques

Identifiers

PMID29955046
PMCPMC6023878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.