Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29954449›Full record

Trial reportThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2018

Long-term weight loss trajectories following participation in a randomised controlled trial of a weight management programme for men delivered through professional football clubs: a longitudinal cohort study and economic evaluation.

Cindy M Gray, Sally Wyke, Ruiqi Zhang, Annie S Anderson, Sarah Barry, Nicki Boyer, Graham Brennan, Andrew Briggs, Christopher Bunn, Craig Donnachie and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Cindy M GraySchool of Social and Political Sciences, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, 25-29 Bute Gardens, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RS, UK. cindy.gray@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4295-6110
Sally WykeSchool of Social and Political Sciences, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, 25-29 Bute Gardens, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RS, UK.
Ruiqi ZhangRobertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Boyd Orr Building, University Avenue, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Annie S AndersonCentre for Public Health Nutrition Research, Mailbox 7, Level 7, Ninewells Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK.
Sarah BarryRobertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Boyd Orr Building, University Avenue, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Nicki BoyerHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, 1 Lilybank Gardens, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, UK.
Graham BrennanInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, 25-29 Bute Gardens, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RS, UK.
Andrew BriggsHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, 1 Lilybank Gardens, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, UK.
Christopher BunnInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, 25-29 Bute Gardens, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RS, UK.
Craig DonnachieInstitute for Social Marketing, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Glasgow, FK9 4LA, UK.
Eleanor GrieveHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, 1 Lilybank Gardens, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, UK.
Ciaran Kohli-LynchHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, 1 Lilybank Gardens, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, UK.
Suzanne M LloydRobertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Boyd Orr Building, University Avenue, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Alex McConnachieRobertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Boyd Orr Building, University Avenue, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Colin McCowanRobertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Boyd Orr Building, University Avenue, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Alice MacLeanMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3QB, UK.
Nanette MutrieInstitute for Sport, Physical Education and Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, 2.27 St Leonard's Land, Holyrood Road, Edinburgh, EH8 8AQ, UK.
Kate HuntInstitute for Social Marketing, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Glasgow, FK9 4LA, UK.
University of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Stirling · GBMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU12Department of Health 09/3010/06Department of Health PHR/13/99/32Medical Research Council MC_U130059811Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/12Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/3Public Health Research Programme 13/99/32
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity is a major public health concern requiring innovative interventions that support people to lose weight and keep it off long term. However, weight loss maintenance remains a challenge and is under-researched, particularly in men. The Football Fans in Training (FFIT) programme engages men in weight management through their interest in football, and encourages them to incorporate small, incremental physical activity and dietary changes into daily life to support long-term weight loss maintenance. In 2011/12, a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of FFIT demonstrated effectiveness and cost-effectiveness at 12 months. The current study aimed to investigate long-term maintenance of weight loss, behavioural outcomes and lifetime cost-effectiveness following FFIT.

methodsA longitudinal cohort study comprised 3.5-year follow-up of the 747 FFIT RCT participants. Men aged 35-65 years, BMI ≥ 28 kg/m

resultsOf 665 men invited, 488 (73%; 65% of the 747 RCT participants) attended 3.5-year measurements. The FFIT-FU-I group sustained a mean weight loss of 2.90 kg (95% CI 1.78, 4.02; p < 0.001) 3.5 years after starting FFIT; 32.2% (75/233) weighed ≥5% less than baseline. The FFIT-FU-C group had lost 2.71 kg (1.65, 3.77; p < 0.001) at the 3.5-year measurements (2.5 years after starting FFIT); 31.8% (81/255) weighed ≥5% less than baseline. There were significant sustained improvements in self-reported physical activity and diet in both groups. The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness of FFIT was £10,700-£15,300 per QALY gained at 3.5 years, and £1790-£2200 over participants' lifetime.

conclusionsParticipation in FFIT under research and routine conditions leads to long-term weight loss and improvements in physical activity and diet. Investment in FFIT is likely to be cost-effective as part of obesity management strategies in countries where football is popular.

trial registrationISRCTN32677491 , 20 October 2011.

Indexed as

SoccerAdultAgedBody Mass IndexCohort StudiesCost-Benefit AnalysisDietExerciseFollow-Up StudiesHealth PromotionHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedObesityProgram EvaluationCost-effectivenessDietFootballInterventionLong -term weight loss maintenanceMenPhysical activityWeight management

Identifiers

PMID29954449
PMCPMC6022303
OpenAlexW2803933182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.