ArticleMicrobiome2018
Signatures of ecological processes in microbial community time series.
Article in Microbiome, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncovering the role of biogeography, resources, food web composition and time during microbial primary succession.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2026Article
- Reconstructing community dynamics from limited observations.Microbiome · 2026Article
- CoDaLoMic: An R package for modeling microbiome compositional and longitudinal data.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- KeySDL: sparse dictionary learning for keystone microbe identification from steady-state observations using a dynamical-systems model.BioData mining · 2026Article
- Fungal Microbiome Within Lichen as a Potential Bioindicator of Climate Change: Insights from Transplant Field Study.Mycobiology · 2026Article
- Fiber-deprived diet weakens lung defense against antimicrobial-resistantGut microbes reports · 2026Article
- Inference of causal interaction networks of gut microbiota using transfer entropy.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Macroecological Laws Can Naturally Arise from Chaotic Internal Species Dynamics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Competition and cooperation: The plasticity of bacterial interactions across environments.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Habitat prevails over host sex in influencing mycobiome structure of terrestrial isopod,Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Diversity in chemical subunits and linkages: a key molecular determinant of microbial richness, microbiota interactions, and substrate utilization.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Increased diversity of beneficial rhizobia enhances faba bean growth.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Co-evolution and Gene Transfers Drive Speciation Patterns in Host-Associated Bacteria.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Microbiome time series data reveal predictable patterns of change.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Gut microbial factors predict disease severity in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis.Nature microbiology · 2024Article
- A Microbial Phenomics Approach to Determine Metabolic Signatures to Enhance SeabreamFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Microbial community organization designates distinct pulmonary exacerbation types and predicts treatment outcome in cystic fibrosis.Nature communications · 2024Observational
- mbtransfer: Microbiome intervention analysis using transfer functions and mirror statistics.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Imprints of ecological processes in the taxonomic core community: an analysis of naturally replicated microbial communities enclosed in oil.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2024Article
- Sediment DNA Records the Critical Transition of Bacterial Communities in the Arid Lake.Microbial ecology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGrowth rates, interactions between community members, stochasticity, and immigration are important drivers of microbial community dynamics. In sequencing data analysis, such as network construction and community model parameterization, we make implicit assumptions about the nature of these drivers and thereby restrict model outcome. Despite apparent risk of methodological bias, the validity of the assumptions is rarely tested, as comprehensive procedures are lacking. Here, we propose a classification scheme to determine the processes that gave rise to the observed time series and to enable better model selection.
resultsWe implemented a three-step classification scheme in R that first determines whether dependence between successive time steps (temporal structure) is present in the time series and then assesses with a recently developed neutrality test whether interactions between species are required for the dynamics. If the first and second tests confirm the presence of temporal structure and interactions, then parameters for interaction models are estimated. To quantify the importance of temporal structure, we compute the noise-type profile of the community, which ranges from black in case of strong dependency to white in the absence of any dependency. We applied this scheme to simulated time series generated with the Dirichlet-multinomial (DM) distribution, Hubbell's neutral model, the generalized Lotka-Volterra model and its discrete variant (the Ricker model), and a self-organized instability model, as well as to human stool microbiota time series. The noise-type profiles for all but DM data clearly indicated distinctive structures. The neutrality test correctly classified all but DM and neutral time series as non-neutral. The procedure reliably identified time series for which interaction inference was suitable. Both tests were required, as we demonstrated that all structured time series, including those generated with the neutral model, achieved a moderate to high goodness of fit to the Ricker model.
conclusionsWe present a fast and robust scheme to classify community structure and to assess the prevalence of interactions directly from microbial time series data. The procedure not only serves to determine ecological drivers of microbial dynamics, but also to guide selection of appropriate community models for prediction and follow-up analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.