Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29954432›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2018

Signatures of ecological processes in microbial community time series.

Karoline Faust, Franziska Bauchinger, Béatrice Laroche, Sophie de Buyl, Leo Lahti, Alex D Washburne, Didier Gonze, Stefanie Widder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karoline FaustKU Leuven Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute, Laboratory of Molecular Bacteriology, Leuven, Belgium. karoline.faust@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0001-7129-2803
Franziska BauchingerDivision of Microbial Ecology, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Sciences, University of Vienna, Althanstr. 14, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Béatrice LarocheDépartement de Mathématiques Informatiques Appliquées, INRA, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Sophie de BuylApplied Physics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Leo LahtiKU Leuven Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute, Laboratory of Molecular Bacteriology, Leuven, Belgium.
Alex D WashburneDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Didier GonzeInteruniversity Institute of Bioinformatics in Brussels, ULB/VUB, Triomflaan, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Stefanie WidderCeMM-Reseach Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Lazarettgasse 14, 1090, Vienna, Austria. stefanie.widder@meduniwien.ac.at.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF V 585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGrowth rates, interactions between community members, stochasticity, and immigration are important drivers of microbial community dynamics. In sequencing data analysis, such as network construction and community model parameterization, we make implicit assumptions about the nature of these drivers and thereby restrict model outcome. Despite apparent risk of methodological bias, the validity of the assumptions is rarely tested, as comprehensive procedures are lacking. Here, we propose a classification scheme to determine the processes that gave rise to the observed time series and to enable better model selection.

resultsWe implemented a three-step classification scheme in R that first determines whether dependence between successive time steps (temporal structure) is present in the time series and then assesses with a recently developed neutrality test whether interactions between species are required for the dynamics. If the first and second tests confirm the presence of temporal structure and interactions, then parameters for interaction models are estimated. To quantify the importance of temporal structure, we compute the noise-type profile of the community, which ranges from black in case of strong dependency to white in the absence of any dependency. We applied this scheme to simulated time series generated with the Dirichlet-multinomial (DM) distribution, Hubbell's neutral model, the generalized Lotka-Volterra model and its discrete variant (the Ricker model), and a self-organized instability model, as well as to human stool microbiota time series. The noise-type profiles for all but DM data clearly indicated distinctive structures. The neutrality test correctly classified all but DM and neutral time series as non-neutral. The procedure reliably identified time series for which interaction inference was suitable. Both tests were required, as we demonstrated that all structured time series, including those generated with the neutral model, achieved a moderate to high goodness of fit to the Ricker model.

conclusionsWe present a fast and robust scheme to classify community structure and to assess the prevalence of interactions directly from microbial time series data. The procedure not only serves to determine ecological drivers of microbial dynamics, but also to guide selection of appropriate community models for prediction and follow-up analysis.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationEcosystemModels, BiologicalTime and Motion StudiesBacterial LoadBiodiversityEcologyEcotypeGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansBrown noiseCommunity dynamicsCommunity modelsNeutrality testNoise typesPink noiseTime series analysis

Identifiers

PMID29954432
PMCPMC6022718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.