Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29954424›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2018

Detection of Plasmodium berghei infected Anopheles stephensi using near-infrared spectroscopy.

Pedro M Esperança, Andrew M Blagborough, Dari F Da, Floyd E Dowell, Thomas S Churcher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. OocystMeter, a machine-learning algorithm to count and measurebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Artificial Intelligence in Intracoronary Imaging.Current cardiology reports · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Pedro M EsperançaMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, W2 1PG, UK. esperanca@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6853-9617
Andrew M BlagboroughDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Dari F DaInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Direction Régionale, 399 Avenue de la liberté, Bobo Dioulasso, 01 01 BP 545, Burkina Faso.
Floyd E DowellUSDA, Agricultural Research Service, Center for Grain and Animal Health Research, 1515 College Avenue, Manhattan, KS, 66502, USA.
Thomas S ChurcherMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, W2 1PG, UK.
Imperial College London · GBAgricultural Research Service · USInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé · BF

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N00227X/1Medical Research Council MR/P01111X/1Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe proportion of mosquitoes infected with malaria is an important entomological metric used to assess the intensity of transmission and the impact of vector control interventions. Currently, the prevalence of mosquitoes with salivary gland sporozoites is estimated by dissecting mosquitoes under a microscope or using molecular methods. These techniques are laborious, subjective, and require either expensive equipment or training. This study evaluates the potential of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) to identify laboratory reared mosquitoes infected with rodent malaria.

methodsAnopheles stephensi mosquitoes were reared in the laboratory and fed on Plasmodium berghei infected blood. After 12 and 21 days post-feeding mosquitoes were killed, scanned and analysed using NIRS and immediately dissected by microscopy to determine the number of oocysts on the midgut wall or sporozoites in the salivary glands. A predictive classification model was used to determine parasite prevalence and intensity status from spectra.

resultsThe predictive model correctly classifies infectious and uninfectious mosquitoes with an overall accuracy of 72%. The false negative and false positive rates were 30 and 26%, respectively. While NIRS was able to differentiate between uninfectious and highly infectious mosquitoes, differentiating between mid-range infectious groups was less accurate. Multiple scans of the same specimen, with repositioning the mosquito between scans, is shown to improve accuracy. On a smaller dataset NIRS was unable to predict whether mosquitoes harboured oocysts.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, we provide the first evidence that NIRS can differentiate between infectious and uninfectious mosquitoes. Currently, distinguishing between different intensities of infection is challenging. The classification model provides a flexible framework and allows for different error rates to be optimised, enabling the sensitivity and specificity of the technique to be varied according to requirements.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnophelesFalse Positive ReactionsGastrointestinal TractMachine LearningMalariaMicroscopyMosquito VectorsOocystsPlasmodium bergheiSalivary GlandsSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredSporozoitesAnopheles stephensiMachine learningNear-infrared spectroscopyPartial least squaresPlasmodium bergheiPredictive modellingVector borne diseasesVector control monitoring

Identifiers

PMID29954424
PMCPMC6027764
OpenAlexW2952276807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.