Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29954395›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2018

Evaluation of the predictive value of tonsil examination by bacteriological culture for detecting positive lung colonization status of nursery pigs exposed to Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae by experimental aerosol infection.

Doris Hoeltig, Florian Nietfeld, Katrin Strutzberg-Minder, Judith Rohde

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Rapid Detection ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Doris HoeltigClinic for Swine and Small Ruminants, Forensic Medicine and Ambulatory Service, University of Veterinary Medicine, Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15, D-30173, Hannover, Germany. doris.hoeltig@tiho-hannover.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2738-4257
Florian NietfeldClinic for Swine, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Frankfurter Str. 112, D- 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Katrin Strutzberg-MinderInnovative Veterinary Diagnostics (IVD-GmbH), Albert-Einstein-Str. 5, 30926, Seelze, Germany.
Judith RohdeInstitute for Microbiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15, D-30173, Hannover, Germany.
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DECS Diagnostics · DEJustus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft 28-RZ-3-72.046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundActinobacillus (A.) pleuropneumoniae is the causative agent of porcine pleuropneumonia. For control of the disease the detection of sub-clinically infected pigs is of major importance to avoid transmitting of subclinical infections. One method recommended is the testing of tonsillar samples for the presence of A. pleuropneumoniae. This is routinely done by PCR techniques. However, based upon PCR susceptibility testing and monitoring of resistance development is impossible. Therefore, in this study the informative values of bacteriological culture of tonsilar samples for the colonisation status of pigs were tested. In total, 163 German Landrace nursery pigs were experimentally exposed to A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 7 by aerosol and the rate of isolation from lung tissue and tonsils and the corresponding degree of lung lesions were investigated.

resultsOverall a significant correlation (p < 0.001) between degree of clinical disease, degree of lung alterations and degree of A. pleuropneumoniae isolation from tonsillar and lung tissue after exposure was detected. Of these animals tested, 74.8% were tested positive in tonsillar and lung samples, 7.4% remained completely negative and in 4.3% the tonsils were tested positive despite negative isolation results from lung tissue. In 13.5% of the pigs A. pleuropneumoniae could be isolated in lung tissue but not in tonsillar samples. In 36.4% of these animals a heavy colonization of the lungs and in 40.9% moderate to severe lung alterations were proven. Hence, the diagnostic sensitivity for the detection of a positive colonization status of the pigs by bacterial culture examination of tonsillar samples was 84.7%, the diagnostic specificity was 66.7% and the predictive values were 94.6% (positive) and 35.3% (negative). The overall sensitivity for A. pleuropneumoniae exposure was 78.2% (tonsils) and 88.0% (lung tissue).

conclusionsIn conclusion, tonsil examination alone for the detection of a positive colonization status of pigs performed might lead to false negative results as lungs might be heavily colonized despite negative tonsillar isolation results. Therefore culture of tonsillar samples should not be the sole test for the confirmation of a pigs' status but used in combination with methods also evaluating the colonization status of the lower respiratory tract.

Indexed as

Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniaeActinobacillus InfectionsAerosolsAnimalsAnimals, NewbornLungMalePalatine TonsilSwineSwine DiseasesAerosolsA. pleuropneumoniaeCulture methodDetectionSensitivitySpecificity

Identifiers

PMID29954395
PMCPMC6022346
OpenAlexW2810599073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.