Trial reportBMC cancer2018
Phase II trial of eribulin mesylate as a first- or second-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter, single-arm trial.
Trial report in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognosis of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma and Effectiveness of Eribulin in Clinical Practice: A Post Hoc Analysis of a 2-Year Post-Marketing Surveillance.Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2025Observational
- Immunomodulatory Effects of Halichondrin Isolated from Marine Sponges and Its Synthetic Analogs in Oncological Applications.Marine drugs · 2024Review
- Eribulin in breast cancer: Current insights and therapeutic perspectives.World journal of experimental medicine · 2024Review
- Current Therapeutic Strategies for Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: From Pharmacists' Perspective.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Effectiveness of eribulin as first-line or second-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative hormone-resistant advanced or metastatic breast cancer: findings from the multi-institutional, prospective, observational KBCRN A001: E-SPEC study.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2022Observational
- Effectiveness and safety of eribulin in Japanese patients with HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer: a 2-year post-marketing observational study in a real-world setting.Investigational new drugs · 2020Observational
- Use of eribulin as an earlier-line chemotherapy for patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2020Article
- Eribulin-induced radiation recall dermatitis: a case report and brief review of the literature.Ecancermedicalscience · 2020Article
- Eribulin in Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: Critic Interpretation of Current Evidence and Projection for Future Scenarios.Journal of Cancer · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEribulin mesylate is currently indicated as a sequential monotherapy to be administered after two chemotherapeutic regimens, including anthracycline and taxane treatments, for treatment of metastatic breast cancer. This open-label, multicenter phase II study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eribulin as a first- or second-line treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer.
methodsThe primary objective was to determine the overall response rate. Secondary objectives were to evaluate progression-free survival and the safety profile. Patients were scheduled to receive eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m
resultsBetween December 2012 and September 2015, 32 patients with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled at 10 participating clinical institutions in Japan, and toxicity and response rates were evaluated. The overall response rate was 43.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 26.5-61.0). The clinical benefit and tumor control rates were 56.3% (95% CI 39.0-73.5) and 78.1% (95% CI 63.8-92.5), respectively. Median progression-free survival was 8.3 months (95% CI 7.1-9.4). A subgroup analysis did not identify any factors affecting the efficacy of eribulin. The most common adverse events were neutropenia (71.9%), alopecia (68.7%), and peripheral neuropathy (46.9%). As a first- or second-line therapy, eribulin showed sufficient efficacy for metastatic breast cancer compared with taxane and capecitabine treatment in previous clinical trials. The safety profile of eribulin was acceptable.
conclusionsEribulin may be another option for first-line chemotherapeutic regimens for metastatic breast cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: This trial was retrospectively registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trial Registry (ID number: UMIN000010334 ). Date of trial registration: April 1st, 2013.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.