Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29954337›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2018

Development and validation of a heart failure with preserved ejection fraction cohort using electronic medical records.

Yash R Patel, Jeremy M Robbins, Katherine E Kurgansky, Tasnim Imran, Ariela R Orkaby, Robert R McLean, Yuk-Lam Ho, Kelly Cho, J Michael Gaziano, Luc Djousse and 2 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Cardiology.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yash R PatelMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology and Research Information Center (MAVERIC), Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Jeremy M RobbinsMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology and Research Information Center (MAVERIC), Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Katherine E KurganskyMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology and Research Information Center (MAVERIC), Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Tasnim ImranMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology and Research Information Center (MAVERIC), Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Ariela R OrkabyMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology and Research Information Center (MAVERIC), Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Robert R McLeanMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology and Research Information Center (MAVERIC), Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Yuk-Lam HoMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology and Research Information Center (MAVERIC), Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Kelly ChoMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology and Research Information Center (MAVERIC), Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
J Michael GazianoMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology and Research Information Center (MAVERIC), Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Luc DjousseMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology and Research Information Center (MAVERIC), Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
David R GagnonMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology and Research Information Center (MAVERIC), Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Jacob JosephMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology and Research Information Center (MAVERIC), Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA. jjoseph16@partners.org.ORCID 0000-0002-7279-4896

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) comprises nearly half of prevalent HF, yet is challenging to curate in a large database of electronic medical records (EMR) since it requires both accurate HF diagnosis and left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) values to be consistently ≥50%.

methodsWe used the national Veterans Affairs EMR to curate a cohort of HFpEF patients from 2002 to 2014. EF values were extracted from clinical documents utilizing natural language processing and an iterative approach was used to refine the algorithm for verification of clinical HFpEF. The final algorithm utilized the following inclusion criteria: any International Classification of Diseases-9 (ICD-9) code of HF (428.xx); all recorded EF ≥50%; and either B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or aminoterminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) values recorded OR diuretic use within one month of diagnosis of HF. Validation of the algorithm was performed by 3 independent reviewers doing manual chart review of 100 HFpEF cases and 100 controls.

resultsWe established a HFpEF cohort of 80,248 patients (out of a total 1,155,376 patients with the ICD-9 diagnosis of HF). Mean age was 72 years; 96% were males and 12% were African-Americans. Validation analysis of the HFpEF algorithm had a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 96%, positive predictive value of 96%, and a negative predictive value of 87% to identify HFpEF cases.

conclusionWe developed a sensitive, highly specific algorithm for detecting HFpEF in a large national database. This approach may be applicable to other large EMR databases to identify HFpEF patients.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersDatabases, FactualData MiningDiureticsEchocardiographyFemaleHeart FailureHumansInternational Classification of DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersDiureticsNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)Electronic medical recordsEpidemiologyHeart failurePreserved ejection fractionValidation

Identifiers

PMID29954337
PMCPMC6022342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.