Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29954317›Full record

ArticleBMC cell biology2018

Establishment and comparison of air-liquid interface culture systems for primary and immortalized swine tracheal epithelial cells.

Haiyan Wang, Lina He, Beibei Liu, Yanyan Feng, Hao Zhou, Zhenzhen Zhang, Yuzi Wu, Jia Wang, Yuan Gan, Ting Yuan and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cell biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Animal organoids as models for integrated One Health research.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Impact of NOJournal of applied toxicology : JAT · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Infection and immunity · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Haiyan WangInstitute of Veterinary Medicine, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Engineering and Technology, Ministry of Agriculture, 50 Zhongling Street, Nanjing, 210014, China.
Lina HeInstitute of Veterinary Medicine, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Engineering and Technology, Ministry of Agriculture, 50 Zhongling Street, Nanjing, 210014, China.
Beibei LiuInstitute of Veterinary Medicine, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Engineering and Technology, Ministry of Agriculture, 50 Zhongling Street, Nanjing, 210014, China.
Yanyan FengCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Hao ZhouInstitute of Veterinary Medicine, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Engineering and Technology, Ministry of Agriculture, 50 Zhongling Street, Nanjing, 210014, China.
Zhenzhen ZhangInstitute of Veterinary Medicine, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Engineering and Technology, Ministry of Agriculture, 50 Zhongling Street, Nanjing, 210014, China.
Yuzi WuInstitute of Veterinary Medicine, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Engineering and Technology, Ministry of Agriculture, 50 Zhongling Street, Nanjing, 210014, China.
Jia WangInstitute of Veterinary Medicine, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Engineering and Technology, Ministry of Agriculture, 50 Zhongling Street, Nanjing, 210014, China.
Yuan GanInstitute of Veterinary Medicine, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Engineering and Technology, Ministry of Agriculture, 50 Zhongling Street, Nanjing, 210014, China.
Ting YuanInstitute of Veterinary Medicine, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Engineering and Technology, Ministry of Agriculture, 50 Zhongling Street, Nanjing, 210014, China.
Meng WuInstitute of Veterinary Medicine, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Engineering and Technology, Ministry of Agriculture, 50 Zhongling Street, Nanjing, 210014, China.
Xing XieInstitute of Veterinary Medicine, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Engineering and Technology, Ministry of Agriculture, 50 Zhongling Street, Nanjing, 210014, China.
Zhixin FengInstitute of Veterinary Medicine, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Engineering and Technology, Ministry of Agriculture, 50 Zhongling Street, Nanjing, 210014, China. fzxjaas@163.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9113-4706

Funding

Jiangsu Province Natural Sciences Foundation BK20160583National Natural Science Foundation of China 31700157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAir-liquid interface (Ali) systems allow the establishment of a culture environment more representative of that in vivo than other culture systems. They are useful for performing mechanistic studies of respiratory epithelial cells as drug permeation barriers and can be used to study the interactions between hosts and respiratory pathogens. However, there have been few studies concerning Ali cultures of primary swine tracheal epithelial cells (STECs) and an immortalized STEC line, and the differences between these two systems remain poorly defined.

resultsIn this study, we established Ali culture systems for primary STECs and for immortalized STEC line, and we systematically compared the differentiation capacities and immunological functions of these systems for the first time. Under Ali culture conditions, immortalized STEC line and primary STECs could survive for at least forty days, formed tight junctions and differentiated into stratified cells. They both possessed complete abilities to produce mucin and inflammatory cytokines and develop cilia. However, in contrast to primary STECs, which had a heterogeneous morphology, Ali-cultured immortalized STEC line appeared to be a homogenous population. The formation of tight junctions in Ali-cultured primary STECs was superior to that in immortalized STEC line. In addition, cilia in Ali-cultured immortalized STEC line were more pronounced, but their duration of expression was shorter than in primary STECs.

conclusionsAli-cultured primary STECs and immortalized STEC line systems possessing complete abilities to undergo ciliary differentiation and inflammatory cytokine production were established for the first time in this study, and several differences in morphology and the formation of tight junctions and cilia were observed between these two systems. These two systems will be important tools for drug screening studies, as well as for detailed analyses of the interactions between hosts and respiratory pathogens.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCell Line, TransformedCytokinesElectric ImpedanceEpithelial CellsFemaleInflammation MediatorsMucinsSus scrofaTight JunctionsToll-Like ReceptorsTracheaZonula Occludens-1 ProteinCytokinesInflammation MediatorsMucinsToll-Like ReceptorsZonula Occludens-1 ProteinAir-liquid interfacecomparisonDifferentiationImmortalized swine tracheal epithelial cell linePrimary swine tracheal epithelial cells

Identifiers

PMID29954317
PMCPMC6025731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.