ArticleNeuroscience2018
Masking Differentially Affects Envelope-following Responses in Young and Aged Animals.
Article in Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Neurometric amplitude modulation detection in the inferior colliculus of Young and Aged rats.Hearing research · 2024Article
- Cortical-brainstem interplay during speech perception in older adults with and without hearing loss.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Brainstem speech encoding is dynamically shaped online by fluctuations in cortical α state.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Longitudinal auditory pathophysiology following mild blast-induced trauma.Journal of neurophysiology · 2021Article
- Evolving perspectives on the sources of the frequency-following response.Nature communications · 2019Review
- Age-related Changes in Neural Coding of Envelope Cues: Peripheral Declines and Central Compensation.Neuroscience · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Age-related hearing decline typically includes threshold shifts as well as reduced wave I auditory brainstem response (ABR) amplitudes due to cochlear synaptopathy/neuropathy, which may compromise precise coding of suprathreshold speech envelopes. This is supported by findings with older listeners, who have difficulties in envelope and speech processing, especially in noise. However, separating the effects of threshold elevation, synaptopathy, and degradation by noise on physiological representations may be difficult. In the present study, the effects of notched, low- and high-pass noise on envelope-following responses (EFRs) in aging were compared when sound levels (aged: 85-dB SPL; young: 60- to 80-dB SPL) were matched between groups peripherally, by matching wave I ABR amplitudes, or centrally by matching EFR amplitudes. Low-level notched noise reduced EFRs to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) tones in young animals for notch widths up to 2 octaves. High-pass noise above the carrier frequency reduced EFRs. Young animals showed EFR reductions at lower noise levels. Low-pass noise did not reduce EFRs in either young or aged animals. High-pass noise may affect EFR amplitudes in young animals more than aged by reducing the contributions of high-frequency-sensitive inputs. EFRs to SAM tones in modulated noise (NAM) suggest that neurons of young animals can synchronize to NAM at lower sound levels and maintain dual AM representations better than older animals. The overall results show that EFR amplitudes are strongly influenced by aging and the presence of a competing sound that likely reduces or shifts the pool of responsive neurons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.