Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29953736›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2018

Value of incorporating newly identified risk factors into risk prediction for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia.

Yanli Li, Leila Family, Lie H Chen, John H Page, Zandra Klippel, Lanfang Xu, Chun R Chao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yanli LiCenter for Observational Research, Amgen Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Leila FamilyDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Lie H ChenDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA.
John H PageCenter for Observational Research, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Zandra KlippelClinical Development, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Lanfang XuMedhealth Statistical Consulting Inc., Solon, OH, USA.
Chun R ChaoDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Amgen (United States) · USKaiser Permanente · USStatistical Research (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several comorbidities have recently been shown to affect risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN). Here, we evaluated the added predictive value of these comorbidities beyond established FN risk factors. A retrospective cohort study was conducted among adult patients diagnosed with cancer and treated with chemotherapy at Kaiser Permanente Southern California between 2000 and 2009. The study cohort was equally split into training and validation datasets to develop and evaluate the performance of FN risk prediction models in the first chemotherapy cycle. A reference model was developed based on the model proposed by Lyman et al (Cancer 2011;117:1917). A new model was developed by incorporating the newly identified comorbidities such as rheumatoid conditions and thyroid disorders into the reference model. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCC), risk reclassification, and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to evaluate the potential improvement of FN risk prediction by incorporating comorbidities. A total of 15 279 patients were included; 4.2% experienced FN in the first chemotherapy cycle. Including comorbidities in FN risk prediction did not improve AUROCC (reference model 0.71 vs new model 0.72). A significant improvement in individual-level FN risk prediction was indicated by IDI (P = .02). However, significant improvement in risk reclassification was not observed overall (although 6% of all patients were more accurately classified for their FN risk level, 5% were less accurately classified) or when examining predicted FN risk among patients who did and did not develop FN. Incorporating several new comorbidities into FN prediction led to improved FN risk prediction in the first chemotherapy cycle, although the observed improvements were small and might not be clinically relevant.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCaliforniaChemotherapy-Induced Febrile NeutropeniaComorbidityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSEER Programchemotherapycomorbiditiesfebrile neutropeniaprediction modelrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID29953736
PMCPMC6089155
OpenAlexW2810104551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.