SynthesisBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2018
Cannabis contaminants: sources, distribution, human toxicity and pharmacologic effects.
Synthesis in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 153 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cannabis contaminants: sources, distribution, human toxicity and pharmacologic effects.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018Pooled it
- Effects of SativexNutrients · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Heavy metals in cannabis: plant contamination and effects on cannabinoid production.Journal of cannabis research · 2026Article
- International Policy Approaches for Higher THC Cannabis Products: Are They Applicable to the Australian Medicinal Cannabis Framework?Drug and alcohol review · 2026Review
- Knowledge, attitudes, and concerns about medical cannabis among U.S. healthcare professionals.Journal of cannabis research · 2026Article
- Sanitation of medical cannabis flowers (Cannabis sativa L., flos): comparing current technologies and non-thermal plasma novelties from safety and quality perspectives.Journal of cannabis research · 2026Review
- Barriers to accessing prescribed medical cannabis: qualitative insights from people using non-prescribed cannabis for medicinal purposes in the Netherlands.Harm reduction journal · 2025Article
- Medicinal use of non-prescribed cannabis: a cross-sectional survey on patterns of use, motives for use, and treatment access in the Netherlands.Journal of cannabis research · 2025Article
- "It's legal, now what?" development, implementation, and evaluation of interdisciplinary cannabis education for healthcare trainees.Journal of cannabis research · 2025Article
- Unraveling the Enigma of Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome: A Narrative Review of Diagnosis and Management.Cureus · 2025Review
- Willingness to use a drug checking service for cannabis and cannabis-based products: results from an online survey of people who regularly use cannabis in France.Harm reduction journal · 2025Article
- Genotoxicity study ofToxicology reports · 2025Review
- Regulatory trends of organophosphate and pyrethroid pesticides in cannabis and applications of the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database and Caenorhabditis elegans.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025Article
- Entomopathogenic Fungi Effectively ControlPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An analysis of the cultivation, consumption and composition of home-grown cannabis following decriminalisation in the Australian Capital Territory.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Peer-review Blinded Assay Test (P-BAT): a framework for trustless laboratory quality assurance for state-regulated cannabis markets.Journal of cannabis research · 2025Article
- Reducing medical cannabis use risk among Veterans: A descriptive study.Harm reduction journal · 2025Article
- Heavy Metals in Cannabis Vapes and Their Health Implications-A Scoping Review.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2025Article
- A user-informed perspective of the toxicological data gap in India's cannabis landscape.Frontiers in toxicology · 2025Article
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There has been a resurgence in interest and use of the cannabis plant for medical purposes. However, an in-depth understanding of plant contaminants and toxin effects on stability of plant compounds and human bioavailability is needed. This systematic review aims to assess current understanding of the contaminants of cannabis and their effect on human health, leading to the identification of knowledge gaps for future investigation. A systematic search of seven indexed biological and biomedical databases and the Cochrane library was undertaken from inception up to December 2017. A qualitative synthesis of filtered results was undertaken after independent assessment for eligibility by two reviewers. The common cannabis contaminants include microbes, heavy metals and pesticides. Their direct human toxicity is poorly quantified but include infection, carcinogenicity, reproductive and developmental impacts. Cannabis dosing formulations and administration routes affect the transformation and bioavailability of contaminants. There may be important pharmacokinetic interactions between the alkaloid active ingredients of cannabis (i.e. phytocannabinoids) and contaminants but these are not yet identified nor quantified. There is significant paucity in the literature describing the prevalence and human impact of cannabis contaminants. Advances in the availability of cannabis globally warrant further research in this area, particularly when being used for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.