Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29953020›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2018

Trends in dacryocystitis in China: A STROBE-compliant article.

Lijuan Chen, Tongsheng Fu, Hao Gu, Ying Jie, Zhongmou Sun, Donghong Jiang, Jibing Yu, Xinxing Zhu, Jianjiang Xu, Jiaxu Hong

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Microbiology and Antimicrobial Susceptibility in Adult Dacryocystitis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Lijuan ChenPeople's Hospital of Putuo District, Shanghai Department of Ophthalmology, People Hospital, Yangzhong Department of Ophthalmology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Science Key Laboratory Beijing, China Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA Department of Ophthalmology, The Second People Hospital, Taixing The Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo Rudong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Rudong Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Eye, and ENT Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Tongsheng Fu
Hao Gu
Ying Jie
Zhongmou Sun
Donghong Jiang
Jibing Yu
Xinxing Zhu
Jianjiang Xu
Jiaxu Hong
Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University · CNBeijing Tongren Hospital · CNCentral Hospital of Putuo District · CNEye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University · CNHarvard University · USNingbo University Affiliated Hospital · CNPeople's Hospital of Yangzhong · CNTaixing People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to review the distribution, current trends, and microbiological characteristics of bacterial pathogens isolated from dacryocystitis patients in China during the last 15 years.This is a retrospective multiple-center noncomparative case series. The medical records of 15,452 consecutive patients from 7 cities diagnosed as having dacryocystitis between 2002 and 2016 were reviewed. The patients' demographics, microbiological data, and antibiotic sensitivity were reviewed and analyzed.A total of 3344 lacrimal sac content cultures were taken (21.6%) during the study period. A pathogen was identified in 1996 samples (59.7%), with bacterial isolates accounting for 1902 of the positive cultures (95.3%). Gram-positive isolates, gram-negative isolates, and anaerobic bacteria were found in 1218 (61.0%), 607 (30.4%), and 285 (14.3%) samples, respectively. An increase in gram-positive isolates over the study duration was found (P = .003). The predominant isolates were coagulase negative Staphylococci (485, 25.5%), Staphylococcus aureus (186, 9.8%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (184, 9.7%), and Haemophilus influenzae (152, 9.0%). There was a trend toward increasing resistance to erythromycin from 10.5% during the first 5 years of the study to 20.7% during the last 5 years (P < .001). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed that gatifloxacin was the most effective drug against most of gram-positive, gram-negative, and anaerobic bacteria.The microbial culture rate of dacryocystitis in China is low. There was an increase in the percentage of gram-positive bacteria over time. The sensitivity of gram-positive isolates to tested antibiotics is relatively low compared with that of gram-negative isolates. Our data show that the empiric use of fourth-generation fluoroquinolones in refractory dacryocystitis may be justified.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolChinaDacryocystitisDrug Resistance, BacterialFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29953020
PMCPMC6039673
OpenAlexW2810887829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.