Observational studyMedicine2018
Effects of physician's specialty on regular chronic kidney disease care in predialysis: A population-based cross-sectional study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The benefit of planned dialysis to early survival on hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: a nationwide prospective multicenter study in Korea.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Effect of Nephrology Care on Mortality in Incident Dialysis Patients: A Population-Based Cohort Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Association of glomerular filtration rate slope with timely creation of vascular access in incident hemodialysis.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Deep Learning-Based Detection of Early Renal Function Impairment Using Retinal Fundus Images: Model Development and Validation.JMIR medical informatics · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Late referral in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with irregular care and poor prognosis. How the specialty of healthcare provider affect late referral and irregular CKD care remain unclear.We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study to include incident dialysis patients from 2002 to 2007 in Taiwan and observed for 1, 2, and 3 years before dialysis. The medical visits-related information was evaluated every 3 months, retrospectively. Irregular follow-up was defined as missing a follow-up during more than one interval every year.A total of 46,626 patients were included. At 1, 2, and 3 years prior to maintenance dialysis, 87%, 66%, and 50% of patients had regular medical visits; however, only 49%, 23%, and 12% had estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) regularly monitored, respectively. Independent factors of less regular eGFR follow-up included age (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.995, 95% confidence interval 0.993-0.998), cardiac disorder (0.90, 0.82-0.99), and stroke (0.76, 0.69-0.84), as well as regular visits at some other specialties (adjusted OR range: from 0.77 to 0.88); whereas, independent factors of less regular visits at nephrology included diabetes mellitus (0.48, 0.46-0.51), cardiac disorder (0.61, 0.56-0.66), stroke (0.53, 0.48-0.58), and regular visits at any other specialty (adjusted OR range: from 0.22 to 0.78).Regular medical visits were quite common in late CKD patients, but they received regular eGFR measurement and visit at nephrology much less frequently. Physicians play a major role in the late referrals in CKD and its irregular care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.