Observational studyMedicine2018
A retrospective study of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for treating women with post-stroke incontinence.
Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of acupuncture therapy plus related rehabilitation therapy for post-stroke urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Trial
- Effects of nonsurgical, minimally or noninvasive therapies for urinary incontinence due to neurogenic bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2022Article
- The acupuncture-related therapy for post-stroke urinary incontinence: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.Medicine · 2020Article
- Urinary incontinence in postmenopausal women - causes, symptoms, treatment.Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review · 2019Review
- Neurogenic bladder - concepts and treatment recommendations.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective study evaluated the effect of using neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) for the treatment of post-stroke urinary incontinence (PSUI) among female population in China.A total of 163 eligible patients with PSUI were included in this study. Of these, 103 patients were assigned to a treatment group, and 60 subjects were assigned to a control group. All patients in both groups received bladder training. In addition, patients in the treatment group also received NMES. All patients were treated for a total of 8 weeks. The outcome measurements included the amount of urine leakage, urinary symptoms and quality of life. The urinary symptoms were measured by the Bristol Female Urinary Symptoms Questionnaire (BFUSQ) score, and the quality of life was assessed by the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) score. In addition, adverse events were also documented in this study.After 4-week treatment, patients who received NMES did not exert better outcomes in the amount of urine leakage, urinary symptoms, measured by BFUSQ scale, and the quality of life, assessed by ICIQ-SF scale. However, after 8-week treatment, patients in the treatment group showed greater effect in reducing the amount of urine leakage (P < .01), enhancing urinary symptoms, as measured by BFUSQ scale (P < .01), and improving the quality of life, as assessed by ICIQ-SF scale (P < .01), compared with patients in the control group. In addition, no adverse event was recorded during the period of 8-week treatment in this study.The results of this study indicated that NMES may benefit for patients with PSUI after 8-week treatment. Future studies should focus on warranting the results of this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.