Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29952722›Full record

ReviewCell adhesion & migration2018

DDR1 and DDR2 in skin.

Muriel Cario

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell adhesion & migration, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The Role of Myofibroblasts in Physiological and Pathological Tissue Repair.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Muriel Carioa INSERM 1035 , University Bordeaux , Bordeaux , France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DDR1 and DDR2 are expressed in skin but their expression differs according to the skin compartment, epidermis, dermis, hypodermis and to the embryonic origin of the cells. In skin, it seems that during physiological processes such as wound healing or pathological processes such as tumorigenesis or systemic sclerosis development only one of the DDR is dysregulated. Furthermore, the altered DDR in pathological process is not necessarily the DDR implicated in basal homeostasis. Indeed, in epidermis, while DDR1 is the main DDR involved in melanocyte homeostasis, DDR2 seems to be the main DDR implicated in melanoma. On the contrary, in dermis, while DDR2 is necessary for normal wound healing, dysregulation of DDR1 is associated with abnormal wound healing leading to keloid. In conclusion, targeting DDR could be a therapeutic solution, however side effects have to be managed carefully.

Indexed as

AnimalsDiscoidin Domain Receptor 1Discoidin Domain Receptor 2FibroblastsHumansSkinSkin DiseasesWound HealingDiscoidin Domain Receptor 1Discoidin Domain Receptor 2cadherinCCN3cell adhesive proteinsfibroblastintegrinskeratinocyteMelanocyte

Identifiers

PMID29952722
PMCPMC6363048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.