Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29952702›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2018

The Authors Respond: Reframing the Value of Treatments for Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Josh J Carlson, Gregory F Guzauskas, Richard H Chapman, Patricia G Synnott, Shanshan Liu, Elizabeth T Russo, Steven D Pearson, Elizabeth D Brouwer, Daniel A Ollendorf

Abstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Josh J Carlson1 The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle.
Gregory F Guzauskas1 The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle.
Richard H Chapman2 Institute for Clinical and Economic Review Boston, Massachusetts.
Patricia G Synnott2 Institute for Clinical and Economic Review Boston, Massachusetts.
Shanshan Liu2 Institute for Clinical and Economic Review Boston, Massachusetts.
Elizabeth T Russo2 Institute for Clinical and Economic Review Boston, Massachusetts.
Steven D Pearson2 Institute for Clinical and Economic Review Boston, Massachusetts.
Elizabeth D Brouwer1 The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle.
Daniel A Ollendorf2 Institute for Clinical and Economic Review Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

disclosuresFunding for the Carlson et al. study was provided in part by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review. Ollendorf, Synnott, Chapman, and Pearson disclosed grants from Blue Shield of California Foundation, California Health Care Foundation, Laura and John Arnold Foundation, Aetna, AHIP, Anthem, Blue Shield of California, CVS Caremark, Express Scripts, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, OmedaRx, United Healthcare, Kaiser Permanente, Premera, AstraZeneca, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, National Pharmaceutical Council, Takeda, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, Spark Therapeutics, Sanofi, Prime Therapeutics, and Health Care Service Corporation. Carlson disclosed grants from the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review and personal fees from Seattle Genetics, Genentech, and Pfizer. Russo, Guzauskas, Liu, and Brouwer have nothing to disclose.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaCaliforniaCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29952702
PMCPMC10397929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.