ArticleAnesthesia progress2018
Thermophysical Properties of Thermosoftening Nasotracheal Tubes.
Article in Anesthesia progress, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Case Report of Unanticipated Difficult Intubation Due to Posterior Tracheal Angulation.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025Article
- Construction and evaluation of a nomogram prediction model for the risk of epistaxis following nasotracheal intubation: a single-center retrospective cohort study.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
- Perioperative Management of Oral Antithrombotics in Dentistry and Oral Surgery: Part 2.Anesthesia progress · 2023Review
- Comparison of cuff inflation method with curvature control modification in thermosoftened endotracheal tubes during nasotracheal intubation - A prospective randomised controlled study.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thermosoftening treatment of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) nasotracheal tubes (NTTs) can reduce the incidence and amount of epistaxis during nasotracheal intubation. The optimal thermal setting for thermosoftening treatment of NTTs without burn injury was investigated. Two composite types of PVC NTTs were used. Following withdrawal of the PVC NTTs from a bottle of water at 45 or 60°C, the changes in the surface temperature of the NTTs were measured by infrared thermography. Hardness of the NTTs at 25, 30, 35, and 40°C was measured. The incidence of epistaxis during nasotracheal intubation using thermosoftened NTTs was evaluated retrospectively. The surface temperature of both PVC NTTs dipped in 45 and 60°C water decreased to below body temperature 30 seconds after withdrawing them from the bottles. Although thermosoftening treatment proportionally decreased the hardness of both types of NTTs, the degrees differed according to their composition. When avoiding impingement of the NTT on the posterior wall of the nasopharynx, the incidence of mild and moderate epistaxis was 2.3%. Flexibility of PVC NTTs could be obtained by thermosoftening treatment at 60°C without burn injury. Thermosoftening treatment of PVC NTTs may be useful to avoid epistaxis during nasotracheal intubation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.