ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2018
Estradiol treatment in a nonhuman primate model of menopause preserves affective reactivity.
Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Urinary Estradiol in Captive Bonobos: Variation With Reproductive State and Sexual Swelling.American journal of primatology · 2025Article
- Effect of short-term androgen supplementation on cognitive performance in older male rhesus macaques.Neurobiology of aging · 2023Article
- Social housing status impacts rhesus monkeys' affective responding in classic threat processing tasks.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Amygdala or hippocampus damage only minimally impacts affective responding to threat.Behavioral neuroscience · 2022Article
- Anterior Cingulate Cortex Ablation Disrupts Affective Vigor and Vigilance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Monkey's Social Roles Predict Their Affective Reactivity.Affective science · 2021Article
- Animal models of human mood.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021Review
- Shifting sociality during primate ageing.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Human affective life changes with age, becoming more positive and less negative in later life. This change occurs even as aging leads to declines in health and cognitive outcomes. Despite these well-documented effects in humans, the extent to which affective processes change as a result of aging in nonhuman animals, particularly nonhuman primates, is unclear. As a first step toward developing an animal model for human affective aging, we tested aged, surgically menopausal aged and middle-aged gonadally intact female rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) on a classic index of affective reactivity in monkeys, the Human Intruder Task. The Human Intruder Task evaluates behavioral responses to varying levels of threat. Aged, surgically menopausal monkeys received hormone replacement therapy consisting of a cyclic estradiol regimen or vehicle injections as a control. Average responsivity to threat did not vary by condition, but middle-aged monkeys and aged monkeys on estradiol were more reactive to the most potent level of threat than to a moderate level of threat, replicating previously published results in other age groups and male monkeys. In contrast, aged monkeys who were not on estradiol did not show such calibration to threat level. These findings suggest that estrogen may be important for maintaining more youthful affective responding. They also illustrate the utility of behavioral assays of affective reactivity in nonhuman primate models of cognitive and reproductive aging in humans. (PsycINFO Database Record
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.