Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29952311›Full record

ReviewBalkan medical journal2018

The Novel and Minimally Invasive Treatment Modalities for Female Pelvic Floor Muscle Dysfunction; Beyond the Traditional

Yiğit Akın, Matthew Young, Muhammad Elmussareh, Nickolaus Charalampogiannis, Ali Serdar Gözen

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Balkan medical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Postmenopausal women in gynecological care.Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Yiğit AkınDepartment of Urology, İzmir Katip Çelebi University School of Medicine, İzmir, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-7627-3476
Matthew YoungClinic of Urology, Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Wakefield, The United KingdomORCID 0000-0001-9366-0742
Muhammad ElmussarehClinic of Urology, Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Wakefield, The United KingdomORCID 0000-0001-7889-1657
Nickolaus CharalampogiannisDepartment of Urology, SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn, University of Heidelberg, Heilbronn, Germany
Ali Serdar GözenDepartment of Urology, SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn, University of Heidelberg, Heilbronn, GermanyORCID 0000-0002-9975-443X
Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust · GBHeidelberg University · DEIzmir Kâtip Çelebi University · TRSLK-Kliniken Heilbronn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic floor dysfunction is a clinical entity that is prevalent among female patients. Determining the exact underlying cause of pelvic floor dysfunction is difficult, and surgical intervention for this clinical entity may be challenging. Pelvic floor dysfunction can affect the quality of life of the patient by causing stress urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, or both. Well-defined surgical treatment options, minimally invasive approaches, and novel techniques for the treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction have been recently introduced. Here, we evaluated the management options available for patients with stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. We searched Medline and EMBASE databases for relevant articles by using the keywords “pelvic floor dysfunction,” “minimally invasive procedures,” “stress urinary incontinence,” “pelvic organ prolapse,” and “novel techniques”. Traditional treatment options for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse are beyond the scope of our review. Laparoscopic and robotic surgical treatments for pelvic floor dysfunction continue to evolve and develop. These minimally invasive techniques will soon replace open procedures. Alternative novel treatment modalities have also been developed from novel human-compatible materials and are emerging as successful treatments for stress urinary incontinence. The development of these various treatment options has implications for future surgical practice in the field of uro-gynecology.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPelvic FloorPelvic Floor DisordersRobotic Surgical ProceduresTreatment OutcomeUrinary Incontinence, StressMinimally invasive surgerypelvic floorpelvic organ prolapsestress urinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID29952311
PMCPMC6158473
OpenAlexW2810459512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.