Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29952241›Full record

Trial reportIntegrative cancer therapies2018

Whole Body Vibration Exposure on Markers of Bone Turnover, Body Composition, and Physical Functioning in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Michael K Baker, Carolyn J Peddle-McIntyre, Daniel A Galvão, Catherine Hunt, Nigel Spry, Robert U Newton

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Integrative cancer therapies, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael K Baker1 Australian Catholic University, Strathfield, New South Wales, Australia.
Carolyn J Peddle-McIntyre2 Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.
Daniel A Galvão2 Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.
Catherine Hunt3 Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Nigel Spry2 Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.
Robert U Newton2 Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.
Edith Cowan University · AUSir Charles Gairdner Hospital · AUAustralian Catholic University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWomen with breast cancer are often prescribed aromatase inhibitors, which can cause rapid loss of bone mass leading to significant potential for morbidity. Vibration training has been shown to be helpful in reducing bone turnover in postmenopausal women without cancer.

aimTo examine the effect of vibration stimulus on markers of bone turnover in breast cancer patients receiving aromatase inhibitors.

methodsThirty-one breast cancer survivors undergoing treatment with aromatase inhibitors were randomized to vibration stimulus (n = 14) or usual care control (n = 17). Low-frequency and low-magnitude vibration stimulus (27-32 Hz, 0.3 g) was delivered in supervised sessions via standing on a vibration platform for 20 minutes, 3 times per week for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was blood markers of bone resorption (serum N-telopeptide X/creatine) and formation (serum type 1 procollagen N-terminal propeptide; P1NP). Other study outcomes body composition as well as measures of physical functioning. Outcomes were compared between groups using analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline values as well as time on aromatase inhibitors. OUTCOMES: On average, participants were 61.5 years old and overweight (ie, body mass index = 28.5 kg/m

conclusionsShort-term low-magnitude vibration stimulus does not appear to be useful for reducing markers of bone turnover secondary to aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer patients; nor is it useful in improving physical function or symptoms. However, further investigations with larger samples and higher doses of vibration are warranted.

trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12611001094965).

Indexed as

Body CompositionBone RemodelingPhysical Therapy ModalitiesAgedAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAromatase InhibitorsBiomarkersBreast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyExerciseFemaleHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthQuality of LifeAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAromatase InhibitorsBiomarkersaromatase inhibitorsbone metabolismhormone therapyvibration

Identifiers

PMID29952241
PMCPMC6142085
OpenAlexW2810217003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.