ArticleEuropean journal of heart failure2018
Which patients with heart failure should receive specialist palliative care?
Article in European journal of heart failure, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of the Development and Implementation of Needs-Based Palliative Care Tools in Heart Failure and Chronic Respiratory Disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Identification of patients with potential palliative care needs: A systematic review of screening tools in primary care.Palliative medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Referral Criteria to Palliative Care for Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review.Circulation. Heart failure · 2020Pooled it
- Highlights in heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2019Pooled it
- Evaluating Palliative Care Needs in Patients with Advanced Non-Malignant Chronic Conditions: An Umbrella Review of Needs Assessment Tools.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, from pathophysiology to technology tools aim improve patients' management.Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Holistic symptom burden and prognostic value of palliative care needs in heart failure: insights from the integrated palliative care outcome scale.BMC palliative care · 2025Observational
- Article
- National strategy for integrating palliative care into standard cardiac care for people living with heart failure: a position statement from the joint working group of the Swiss Societies of Cardiology and Palliative Care.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Validity and reliability of the palliative care needs assessment tool in Japanese patients with heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Creating more comparable cohorts in observational palliative care studies: A proposed framework to improve applicability and replicability of research.Palliative medicine · 2024Article
- The experiences of patients with advanced heart failure, family carers, and health professionals with palliative care services: a secondary reflexive thematic analysis of longitudinal interview data.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
- Symptom burden, psychosocial distress and palliative care needs in heart failure - A cross-sectional explorative pilot study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2023Article
- Ten Questions and Some Reflections about Palliative Care in Advanced Heart Failure Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Advanced heart failure: guideline-directed medical therapy, diuretics, inotropes, and palliative care.ESC heart failure · 2022Review
- [Assessment tools for palliative care needs in patients with heart failure in general practice].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2022Article
- Palliative care provision for people living with heart failure: The Geneva model.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Palliative care referral criteria and outcomes in cancer and heart failure: a systematic review of literature.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2021Review
- Article
- Palliative care needs-assessment and measurement tools used in patients with heart failure: a systematic mixed-studies review with narrative synthesis.Heart failure reviews · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsWe investigated which patients with heart failure (HF) should receive specialist palliative care (SPC) by first creating a definition of need for SPC in patients hospitalised with HF using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and then testing this definition using the outcome of days alive and out of hospital (DAOH). We also evaluated which baseline variables predicted need for SPC and whether those with this need received SPC. METHODS AND
resultsPROMs assessing quality of life (QoL), symptoms, and mood were administered at baseline and every 4 months. SPC need was defined as persistently severe impairment of any PROM without improvement (or severe impairment immediately preceding death). We then tested whether need for SPC, so defined, was reflected in DAOH, a measure which combines length of stay, days of hospital re-admission, and days lost due to death. Of 272 patients recruited, 74 (27%) met the definition of SPC needs. These patients lived one third fewer DAOH than those without SPC need (and less than a quarter of QoL-adjusted DAOH). A Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) summary score of <29 identified patients who subsequently had SPC needs (area under receiver operating characteristic curve 0.78). Twenty-four per cent of patients with SPC needs actually received SPC (n = 18).
conclusionsA quarter of patients hospitalised with HF had a need for SPC and were identified by a low KCCQ score on admission. Those with SPC need spent many fewer DAOH and their DAOH were of significantly worse quality. Very few patients with SPC needs accessed SPC services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.