Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29951981›Full record

ArticleEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2018

Immediate extubation after esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy enables early ambulation in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer.

Takeharu Imai, Tetsuya Abe, Norihisa Uemura, Kazuhiro Yoshida, Yasuhiro Shimizu

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Feasibility of enhanced recovery protocol in minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takeharu ImaiThe Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan.
Tetsuya AbeThe Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan. tabe@aichi-cc.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-6976-9753
Norihisa UemuraThe Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan.
Kazuhiro YoshidaThe Department of Surgical Oncology, Gifu University, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan.
Yasuhiro ShimizuThe Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan.
Aichi Cancer Center · JPGifu University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe retrospectively compared the effects of immediate extubation (IE) in the operating room with those of overnight mechanical ventilation (MV) after radical transthoracic esophagectomy with 3-field lymphadenectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer.

methodsA total of 96 patients were evaluated. 48 patients were extubated in the operating room after surgery (IE group). The other 48 patients were extubated on the following morning (MV group). The propensity score-matching method was used to assemble a well-balanced cohort. Clinical and postoperative outcomes were investigated in each group. We also compared postoperative laboratory parameters between groups.

resultsThe rate of ambulation on postoperative day (POD) 1 was significantly higher in the IE group compared with that in the MV group (50 vs 19%, respectively, p = 0.003). Moreover, the rate of catecholamine use in the ICU was significantly lower in the IE group compared with that in the MV group (15 vs 65%, respectively, p < 0.001). With regard to postoperative respiratory management, there were no significant differences between groups. The length of ICU stay after esophagectomy was significantly shorter in the IE group compared with that in the MV group (p = 0.01), whereas the length of postoperative hospital stay was similar between groups (p = 0.265). There were also no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications.

conclusionsIE in the operating room is not only safe and feasible, even after transthoracic esophagectomy with radical 3-field lymphadenectomy, but also contributes to decrease in catecholamine use, to increase in ambulation on POD 1 and to shorten the ICU stay.

Indexed as

AgedAirway ExtubationEarly AmbulationEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFemaleHumansLength of StayLymph Node ExcisionMaleMiddle AgedOperating RoomsPostoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesThoracic NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeEsophageal cancerEsophagectomyImmediate extubation

Identifiers

PMID29951981
OpenAlexW2791146854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.