Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29951960›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2019

Non-invasive Cerebrovascular Autoregulation Assessment Using the Volumetric Reactivity Index: Prospective Study.

Vytautas Petkus, Aidanas Preiksaitis, Solventa Krakauskaite, Laimonas Bartusis, Romanas Chomskis, Yasin Hamarat, Erika Zubaviciute, Saulius Vosylius, Saulius Rocka, Arminas Ragauskas

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Non-Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  4. The INfoMATAS project: Methods for assessing cerebral autoregulation in stroke.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Vytautas PetkusHealth Telematics Science Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania. vytautas.petkus@ktu.lt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8964-0738
Aidanas PreiksaitisHealth Telematics Science Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Solventa KrakauskaiteHealth Telematics Science Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Laimonas BartusisHealth Telematics Science Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Romanas ChomskisHealth Telematics Science Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Yasin HamaratHealth Telematics Science Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Erika ZubaviciuteClinic of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Saulius VosyliusClinic of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Saulius RockaClinic of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Arminas RagauskasHealth Telematics Science Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania.

Funding

FP7 Health 602150Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba MIP-087/2015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis prospective study of an innovative non-invasive ultrasonic cerebrovascular autoregulation (CA) monitoring method is based on real-time measurements of intracranial blood volume (IBV) reactions following changes in arterial blood pressure. In this study, we aimed to determine the clinical applicability of a non-invasive CA monitoring method by performing a prospective comparative clinical study of simultaneous invasive and non-invasive CA monitoring on intensive care patients.

methodsCA was monitored in 61 patients with severe traumatic brain injuries invasively by calculating the pressure reactivity index (PRx) and non-invasively by calculating the volumetric reactivity index (VRx) simultaneously. The PRx was calculated as a moving correlation coefficient between intracranial pressure and arterial blood pressure slow waves. The VRx was calculated as a moving correlation coefficient between arterial blood pressure and non-invasively-measured IBV slow waves.

resultsA linear regression between VRx and PRx averaged per patients' monitoring session showed a significant correlation (r = 0.843, p < 0.001; 95% confidence interval 0.751 - 0.903). The standard deviation of the difference between VRx and PRx was 0.192; bias was - 0.065.

conclusionsThis prospective clinical study of the non-invasive ultrasonic volumetric reactivity index VRx monitoring, based on ultrasonic time-of-flight measurements of IBV dynamics, showed significant coincidence of non-invasive VRx index with invasive PRx index. The ultrasonic time-of-flight method reflects blood volume changes inside the acoustic path, which crosses both hemispheres of the brain. This method does not reflect locally and invasively-recorded intracranial pressure slow waves, but the autoregulatory reactions of both hemispheres of the brain. Therefore, VRx can be used as a non-invasive cerebrovascular autoregulation index in the same way as PRx and can also provide information about the CA status encompassing all intracranial hemodynamics.

Indexed as

AdultArterial PressureBrain Injuries, TraumaticCerebral Blood VolumeCerebrovascular CirculationCritical CareFemaleHomeostasisHumansIntracranial PressureMaleMiddle AgedNeurophysiological MonitoringProspective StudiesUltrasonography, Doppler, TranscranialYoung AdultCerebrovascular autoregulationNon-invasive monitoringPressure reactivity indexTraumatic brain injury patientsUltrasonic time-of-flight measurement method

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.