ArticleHerz2018
[Heart failure networks and centers : What does everyday life look like?]
Article in Herz, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiogenic shock: incidence, survival and mechanical circulatory support usage 2007-2017-insights from a national registry.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The German Cardiac Society (DGK) and the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (DGTHG) jointly advocated the initiation and certification of heart failure (HF) networks in a position statement in 2016. In these networks, supraregional HF centers cooperate with specialized regional HF clinics and registered cardiologists to improve intersectoral treatment of patients with HF. So far predominantly supraregional HF centers have achieved certification but more recently regional clinics as well as registered cardiologists have applied for certification, now enabling the comprehensive establishment of HF networks. In this article the background, the current situation and the future perspectives of HF networks are assessed and approaches for better networking are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.