Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29951935›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2019

Determinants of Employment Outcome for the People with Schizophrenia Using the WHODAS 2.0.

Shu-Jen Lu, Tsan-Hon Liou, Chia-Feng Yen, Feng-Hang Chang, Yen-Ling Chen, Reuben Escorpizo, David R Strauser, Ay-Woan Pan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Predictors of Employment Status for Persons with Bipolar Disorder.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Functioning Problems in Persons with Schizophrenia in the Russian Context.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  13. Effects of Hearing Disability on the Employment Status Using WHODAS 2.0 in Taiwan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shu-Jen LuSchool of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tsan-Hon LiouDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chia-Feng YenDepartment of Public Health, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
Feng-Hang ChangGraduate Institute of Injury Prevention and Control, College of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yen-Ling ChenInstitute of Biophotonics, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Reuben EscorpizoDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
David R StrauserDepartment of Kinesiology and Community Health at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL, USA.
Ay-Woan PanSchool of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. aywoan@ntu.edu.tw.ORCID 0000-0002-4793-2505

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 106-2511-S-002-016-MY2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Since the vocational outcomes of people with schizophrenia should be viewed in a holistic way, the second edition of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) might provide an evaluation regarding employment potential. To determine whether the WHODAS 2.0 scores can be used to predict employment status, we examined the probabilistic cut-off values of the scores and analyzed the relationship between work status and demographic characteristics. Methods We selected 31,793 people aged between 18 and 65 with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder from the disability evaluation database in Taiwan and separated them into two groups based on employment status (employed and unemployed). We used logistic regression to explore the association between employment and demographic characteristics. Moreover, we conducted a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine the cut-off point to assist in determining employment potential based on the WHODAS 2.0 score. Results Among the 31,793 participants, 3367 were employed and 18,801 were unemployed. The unemployed participants accounted for a higher percentage of disability in each domain of the WHODAS. The ROC analysis revealed that the optimal cut-off point of the WHODAS score to distinguish the people who were employed and unemployed was 25.78 (area under curve = 0.80). Conclusions The present study indicated that work status can be determined by the total score across the six domains of the WHODAS score. Furthermore, the probability of employment may be determined initially by the cut-off point of the WHODAS score in order to economize evaluation time and prepare prevocational training for those with scores above 25.78.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesEmploymentFemaleHumansInternational Classification of Functioning, Disability and HealthMaleMiddle AgedSchizophreniaSeverity of Illness IndexTaiwanYoung AdultDisability and (ICF)EmploymentInternational classification of functioningSchizophreniaVocational rehabilitationWorld Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.