ArticleUpdates in surgery2018
Hostile pelvis: how to avoid permanent stoma.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Abdominoperineal pull-through with delayed coloanal anastomosis for pelvic anastomotic failure-a systematic review.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Pooled it
- Superior anal function in patients undergoing stoma closure within 6 months after LAR and analysis of factors associated with LARS syndrome: insights from experienced surgeons.Updates in surgery · 2025Review
- Modified delayed coloanal anastomosis following TME for mid and low rectal cancer: 19 consecutive patients from a single center.Updates in surgery · 2024Article
- Effect of low anterior resection syndrome on quality of life in colorectal cancer patients: A retrospective observational study.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023Article
- Short stump and high anastomosis pull-through (SHiP) procedure for delayed coloanal anastomosis with no protective stoma for low rectal cancer.Updates in surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim was to report our experience with delayed colo-anal anastomosis (DCA) to avoid permanent stoma for complex rectal cases evaluating short- and long-term outcomes. Nine patients who underwent DCA from 2011 to 2016 were collected and analysed case by case. We considered medical history and surgical outcomes. Long-term bowel function was evaluated using the Wexner and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score at 6, 12 and 24 months. The range from previous surgery and salvage procedure was 337 days. All cases were performed with a full laparoscopic approach. The median length of hospital stay was 15 days. The median follow-up was 970.5 days. There was no peri-operative mortality. Two patients developed a post-operative pelvic abscess that required redo surgery. Long-term post-operative complications were mucosal prolapsed, anastomosis retraction and anastomotic stricture. The average values of LARS and Wexner scores were, respectively, at 6 months 33.7 and 16.2, at 12 months 28.5 and 11.7, at 24 months 21.1 and 6.7. Colo-anal sleeve delayed anastomosis appears a real answer to avoid permanent stoma in selected patients. The laparoscopic procedure is safe and feasible for skilful mini-invasive surgeons. Our experience describes the complexity of clinical history of these patients underlying a slow, but progressive improvement in continence after restoration of bowel continuity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.