ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2018
Clinical application of postoperative non-invasive positive pressure ventilation after lung cancer surgery.
Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Lung Cancer: Physiological Principles and Clinical Utilization in Surgical and Non-surgical Settings.Thoracic research and practice · 2025Article
- Clinical significance of postoperative pulmonary complications in elderly patients with lung cancer.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2022Article
- Individualized lung protective ventilation vs. conventional ventilation during general anesthesia in laparoscopic total hysterectomy.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020Article
- Single lung ventilation in patients undergoing lobectomy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to clarify the clinical efficacy of postoperative non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (PONIV) after pulmonary lobectomy in patients with lung cancer.
methodsFrom August 2010 and July 2015, 143 patients with lung cancer who underwent pulmonary lobectomy were retrospectively reviewed. PONIV was used immediately after surgery until the morning of postoperative day (POD) 1. Arterial blood gas was analyzed before and just after surgery (POD0) and on POD1. Oxygenation ability was perioperatively assessed by PaO
results112 patients received PONIV. From POD0 to POD1, the PaO
conclusionsPONIV effectively improved oxygenation in patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy in patients with poor status, especially in patients with PaO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.