Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29951636›Full record

ArticleBJS open2018

Incidence of and risk factors for stoma-site incisional herniation after reversal.

F J Amelung, L E V M de Guerre, E C J Consten, J W Kist, P M Verheijen, I A M J Broeders, W A Draaisma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Reversal of stoma with biosynthetic mesh fascial reinforcement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. The rate of ileostomy site incisional hernias: more common than we think?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. When to use a prophylactic mesh after stoma closure: a case-control study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Stoma closure and reinforcement (SCAR): A study protocol for a pilot trial.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2020
    Article
  20. Hernia at the stoma site after loop ileostomy reversal.International journal of colorectal disease · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F J AmelungDepartment of Surgery Meander Medical Centre Amersfoort The Netherlands.
L E V M de GuerreDepartment of Surgery Meander Medical Centre Amersfoort The Netherlands.
E C J ConstenDepartment of Surgery Meander Medical Centre Amersfoort The Netherlands.
J W KistDepartment of Radiology Meander Medical Centre Amersfoort The Netherlands.
P M VerheijenDepartment of Surgery Meander Medical Centre Amersfoort The Netherlands.
I A M J BroedersDepartment of Surgery Meander Medical Centre Amersfoort The Netherlands.
W A DraaismaDepartment of Surgery Meander Medical Centre Amersfoort The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1841-8096
Meander Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStoma reversal is often considered a straightforward procedure with low short-term complication rates. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of incisional hernia following stoma reversal and identify risk factors for its development.

methodsThis was an observational study of consecutive patients who underwent stoma reversal between 2009 and 2015 at a teaching hospital. Patients followed for at least 12 months were eligible. The primary outcome was the development of incisional hernia at the previous stoma site. Independent risk factors were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

resultsAfter a median follow-up of 24 (range 12-89) months, 110 of 318 included patients (34·6 per cent) developed an incisional hernia at the previous stoma site. In 85 (77·3 per cent) the hernia was symptomatic, and 72 patients (65·5 per cent) underwent surgical correction. Higher BMI (odds ratio (OR) 1·12, 95 per cent c.i. 1·04 to 1·21), stoma prolapse (OR 3·27, 1·04 to 10·27), parastomal hernia (OR 5·08, 1·30 to 19·85) and hypertension (OR 2·52, 1·14 to 5·54) were identified as independent risk factors for the development of incisional hernia at the previous stoma site. In addition, the risk of incisional hernia was greater in patients with underlying malignant disease who had undergone a colostomy than in those who had had an ileostomy (OR 5·05, 2·28 to 11·23).

conclusionIncisional hernia of the previous stoma site was common and frequently required surgical correction. Higher BMI, reversal of colostomy in patients with an underlying malignancy, stoma prolapse, parastomal hernia and hypertension were identified as independent risk factors.

Identifiers

PMID29951636
PMCPMC5989939
OpenAlexW2793493717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.