ArticleBJS open2018
Effects of transcranial direct-current stimulation on laparoscopic surgical skill acquisition.
Article in BJS open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02756052 (Enhancing Laparoscopic Skill Acquisition and Retention With Transcranial Direct-current Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Enhancing Laparoscopic Skill Acquisition and Retention With Transcranial Direct-current Stimulation
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- M1 transcranial direct current stimulation augments laparoscopic surgical skill acquisition.Scientific reports · 2023Trial
- Neuroenhancement of surgeons during robotic suturing.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Trial
- Utilizing transcranial direct current stimulation to enhance laparoscopic technical skills training: A randomized controlled trial.Brain stimulationTrial
- Anodal cerebellar t-DCS impacts skill learning and transfer on a robotic surgery training task.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Optical neuroimaging and neurostimulation in surgical training and assessment: A state-of-the-art review.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2023Review
- Article
- The Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Enhancing Surgical Skill Acquisition: A Preliminary Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Dataset of prefrontal transcranial direct-current stimulation to improve early surgical knot-tying skills.Data in brief · 2021Article
- Noninvasive Brain Stimulation & Space Exploration: Opportunities and Challenges.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2020Review
- The Effects of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation on Human Motor Functions: A Comprehensive Review of Functional Neuroimaging Studies.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChanges in medical education may limit opportunities for trainees to gain proficiency in surgical skills. Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) can augment motor skill learning and may enhance surgical procedural skill acquisition. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of tDCS on simulation-based laparoscopic surgical skill acquisition.
methodsIn this double-blind, sham-controlled randomized trial, participants were randomized to receive 20 min of anodal tDCS or sham stimulation over the dominant primary motor cortex, concurrent with Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery simulation-based training. Primary outcomes of laparoscopic pattern-cutting and peg transfer tasks were scored at baseline, during repeated performance over 1 h, and again at 6 weeks. Intent-to-treat analysis examined the effects of treatment group on skill acquisition and retention.
resultsOf 40 participants, those receiving tDCS achieved higher mean(s.d.) final pattern-cutting scores than participants in the sham group (207·6(30·0) versus 186·0(32·7) respectively; P = 0·022). Scores were unchanged at 6 weeks. Effects on peg transfer scores were not significantly different (210·2(23·5) in the tDCS group versus 201·7(18·1) in the sham group; P = 0·111); the proportion achieving predetermined proficiency levels was higher for tDCS than for sham stimulation. Procedures were well tolerated with no serious adverse events and no decreases in motor measures.
conclusionThe addition of tDCS to laparoscopic surgical training may enhance skill acquisition. Trials of additional skills and translation to non-simulated performance are required to determine the potential value in medical education and impact on patient outcomes. Registration number: NCT02756052 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.