Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29951629›Full record

ReviewBJS open2018

Meta-analysis of the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on patterns of recurrence in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

S Schorn, I E Demir, N Samm, F Scheufele, L Calavrezos, M Sargut, R M Schirren, H Friess, G O Ceyhan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJS open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

S SchornDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstrasse 22 D-81675 Munich Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6811-1220
I E DemirDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstrasse 22 D-81675 Munich Germany.
N SammDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstrasse 22 D-81675 Munich Germany.
F ScheufeleDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstrasse 22 D-81675 Munich Germany.
L CalavrezosDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstrasse 22 D-81675 Munich Germany.
M SargutDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstrasse 22 D-81675 Munich Germany.
R M SchirrenDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstrasse 22 D-81675 Munich Germany.
H FriessDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstrasse 22 D-81675 Munich Germany.
G O CeyhanDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstrasse 22 D-81675 Munich Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeoadjuvant therapy may increase the rate of radical tumour resection in patients with pancreatic cancer. Its impact on tumour recurrence has not been investigated fully. This study aimed to assess the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on patterns of recurrence.

methodsA systematic review was performed of articles identified through the PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Ovid and Google Scholar databases that analysed the relationship between neoadjuvant therapy and recurrence published to January 2016. The main endpoint was overall tumour recurrence. Other endpoints included local recurrence, any kind of distant, hepatic, pulmonary or peritoneal metastasis.

resultsA total of 4257 citations were reviewed. Twelve observational studies comprising 1365 patients were analysed. Neoadjuvant therapy significantly reduced the risk of overall (risk ratio (RR) 0·82, 95 per cent c.i. 0·74 to 0·90; P < 0·001) and local (RR 0·42, 0·32 to 0·55; P < 0·001) recurrence. Neoadjuvant therapy did not reduce the risk of any kind of distant (RR 1·02, 0·91 to 1·14; P = 0·78), hepatic (RR 0·86, 0·68 to 1·10; P = 0·23), pulmonary (RR 0·99, 0·37 to 2·66; P = 0·98) or peritoneal (RR 0·88, 0·57 to 1·38; P = 0·58) metastasis.

conclusionNeoadjuvant therapy reduced the risk of local recurrence but not that of distant metastasis.

Identifiers

PMID29951629
PMCPMC5989995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.