ArticleBJS open2017
Effects of patient factors on inpatient mortality after complex liver, pancreatic and gastric resections.
Article in BJS open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mortality factors in pancreatic surgery: A systematic review. How important is the hospital volume?International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2022Pooled it
- The impact of cirrhosis and MELD score on postoperative morbidity and mortality among patients selected for liver resection.American journal of surgery · 2020Article
- Prediction of Postoperative Mortality in Patients with Organ Failure After Gastric Cancer Surgery.World journal of surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is mixed evidence that patients who receive care in hospitals with a low case volume for complex gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary operations have an increased risk of inpatient death.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was performed of patients who had complex gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary operations in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project 2012 National Inpatient Sample. Multivariable weighted hierarchical generalized linear models were used to test the relationship between hospital case volume and probability of inpatient death, with detailed adjustments for the concurrent effects of differences in associated patient co-morbidities.
resultsA total of 8260 pancreaticoduodenectomies, 2750 major hepatectomies and 3250 total gastrectomies were identified. Inpatient death occurred in 3·6 per cent of patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy, 4·9 per cent after major hepatectomy and 4·6 per cent after total gastrectomy. Mean hospital case volume was 50·6 (median 40) for pancreaticoduodenectomy, 23·6 (median 15) for major hepatectomy, 15·1 (median 10) for total gastrectomy and 70·2 (median 50) for any of the three operations. Hospital case volume was not a statistically significant predictor of mortality after any operation (all P ≥ 0·188). Patient characteristics including age and co-morbidity were highly significant predictors of mortality (P < 0·001). No significant improvements in model performance were obtained by adding hospital case volume to any model that already included adjustments for patient-level differences in age and co-morbid disease, for any functional format (P ≥ 0·146 for all C statistic differences from baseline).
conclusionPatient co-morbidity, not hospital case volume, was associated with significant differences in inpatient mortality following complex gastric, pancreatic and hepatobiliary resections.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.