Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29951620›Full record

ArticleBJS open2017

Relationship between intra-abdominal hypertension, outcome and the revised Atlanta and determinant-based classifications in acute pancreatitis.

P Marcos-Neira, F Zubia-Olaskoaga, S López-Cuenca, L Bordejé-Laguna, Epidemiology of Acute Pancreatitis in Intensive Care Medicine study group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Impact of 24-hour urine output trajectories on intra-abdominal hypertension risk in acute pancreatitis patients: Insights from MIMIC-IV database.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Management of acute pancreatitis in the "no man's land".Internal and emergency medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. [Management of acute pancreatitis in the emergency department and the intensive care unit].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Management of Severe Acute Pancreatitis.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

P Marcos-NeiraDepartment of Intensive Care Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital Barcelona Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9166-5280
F Zubia-OlaskoagaDepartment of Intensive Care Donostia - San Sebastián University Hospital Guipúzcoa Spain.
S López-CuencaDepartment of Intensive Care Getafe University Hospital Madrid Spain.
L Bordejé-LagunaDepartment of Intensive Care Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital Barcelona Spain.
Epidemiology of Acute Pancreatitis in Intensive Care Medicine study group
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol · ESBiogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ESHospital Universitario de Getafe · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and severity of acute pancreatitis (AP) measured by the revised Atlanta classification (RAC) and determinant-based classification (DBC). Secondary objectives were to assess IAH as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in the ICU.

methodsThis prospective international observational study included patients admitted to the ICU with AP and at least one organ failure. Information was collected on demographics, severity scores at admission using RAC and DBC, organ failure, mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), surgery and mortality. Maximum intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) during ICU stay was used for analysis.

resultsSome 374 patients were included. The hospital mortality rate was 28·9 per cent. IAP was measured in 301 patients (80·5 per cent), of whom 274 (91·0 per cent) had IAH and 103 (34·2 per cent) acute compartment syndrome. A higher IAH grade was more likely in patients with severe AP (42 per cent for grade I versus 84 per cent for grade IV) and acute critical pancreatitis (9 versus 25 per cent; P = 0·001). Compared with grade I IAH, patients with grade IV had more infected necrosis (16 versus 28 per cent; P = 0·005), need for surgery (27 versus 50 per cent; P = 0·006), mechanical ventilation (53 versus 84 per cent; P = 0·007) and requirement for CRRT (22 versus 66 per cent; P < 0·001). IAH predicted shock (area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) 0·79, 95 per cent c.i. 0·73 to 0·84), respiratory failure (AUC 0·82, 0·77 to 0·87), renal failure (AUC 0·93, 0·89 to 0·96) and mortality (AUC 0·89, 0·86 to 0·93).

conclusionIAH was associated with severity of AP classified according to both RAC and DBC systems. IAP grade can predict outcome of AP during ICU stay.

Identifiers

PMID29951620
PMCPMC5989946
OpenAlexW2773204979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.