ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2018
Is there a room for immune checkpoint inhibitors in early stage non-small cell lung cancer?
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors enhance chemotherapy in preclinical models of esophageal adenocarcinoma by targeting cancer-associated fibroblasts.Cell reports. Medicine · 2022Article
- Metabolomic Fingerprinting for the Detection of Early-Stage Lung Cancer: From the Genome to the Metabolome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Reclassifying TNM stage I/II colorectal cancer into two subgroups with different overall survival, tumor microenvironment, and response to immune checkpoint blockade treatment.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Current Status of Immunotherapy for Lung Cancer and Future Perspectives.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2020Review
- [Preliminary Study on the Biological Markers for I-IIb Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Based on a Serum-peptidomics].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents 16% of all new NSCLC at diagnosis with a 5-year survival rate of about 60%. Surgical intervention and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy represent the cornerstone treatments, but no significant advances have been achieved since several decades in term of relapse rate reduction or survival improvement. Immunotherapy represents an appealing strategy considering the acceptable toxicity profile but, despite the awesome changing recently introduced in the locally advanced and metastatic setting, its role in early NSCLC is not clear yet. In the past few years, two strategies have been investigated to improve the early NSCLC outcomes eliciting the anti-tumour immune response: tumour vaccines and adoptive cellular therapies. However, none of them provided convincing results. Preclinical and clinical data supported the prognostic role of immune checkpoints in resected NSCLC even if they did not show a clear predictive value for adjuvant treatment. However, some preliminary data about safety and efficacy of neo-adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors encourage further investigation of their potential role as monotherapy or as part of a multimodal strategy. Then, even if no significant progress has been done in early NSCLC treatment until today, checkpoint inhibitors can open the door to a new strategy in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.