ArticleEFORT open reviews2018
New advances in intra-operative imaging in trauma.
Article in EFORT open reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic Intraoperative Imaging in Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery: Initial Clinical Experience With a Self-Driving Mobile 3D C-Arm in the First 300 Cases.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026Article
- Availability, utilization patterns, and challenges of intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy in orthopedic surgeries: a survey of orthopedic surgeons in Nigeria.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Clinical applications of portable CT scanners.The British journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Hospital setting of endovascular repair influences procedural outcomes in blunt traumatic aortic injury.Journal of vascular surgery · 2025Observational
- Automated Digital Image Optimisation in Intraoperative 2D and 3D Imaging Using a Mobile C-Arm With Flat-Panel Detector.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2025Article
- A serial case study of the combined use of intraoperative CT and surgical navigation system for the removal of small foreign bodies in the maxillofacial region.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2024Article
- Is the Additional Effort for an Intraoperative CT Scan Justified for Distal Radius Fracture Fixations? A Comparative Clinical Feasibility Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Finding NEEMO: towards organizing smart digital solutions in orthopaedic trauma surgery.EFORT open reviews · 2020Review
- [Hybrid operating room : Application in trauma surgery and orthopaedics].Der Unfallchirurg · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The invention of flat-panel detectors led to a revolution in medical imaging. The major benefits of this technology are a higher image quality and dose reduction. Flat-panel detectors have proved to be superior to standard C-arms (= C-arm with radiograph source and image intensifier).Cone-beam computed tomography (cone-beam CT) is a 3D data set, which can be acquired with a flat-panel detector. The cone-shaped beam is used for 3D data generation. For cone-beam CT acquisition, the flat-panel detector rotates around the patient lying on the operating table. Intra-operative cone-beam CT can be a very helpful tool in orthopaedic surgery. Immediate control of fracture reduction and implant positioning in high image quality can reduce the need for secondary revision surgery due to implant malposition.In recent years there has been a revival of standard fan beam CT technology in operating rooms. Fixed and mobile systems are available. Fixed systems are typically placed on a sliding gantry. Different mobile intra-operative CT scanners were recently introduced. Due to their mobility, they are not bound to a specific operating room. The use of standard intra-operative CT scanners results in high 3D image quality but, in comparison with a cone-beam CT scanner, fluoroscopy is not possible.The introduction of flat-panel detectors has led to improvements in intra-operative image quality combined with dose reduction. The possibility of high-quality 3D imaging in combination with navigation can assure optimal implant placement. Due to immediate control of the osteosynthesis, revision surgery at a later time can be prevented. Cite this article:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.