ReviewInterface focus2018
Control of gaze in natural environments: effects of rewards and costs, uncertainty and memory in target selection.
Review in Interface focus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Motion-corrected eye tracking improves gaze accuracy during visual fMRI experiments.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Applying movement ecology models to comparative cognition experiments: a field test in hummingbirds.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- A robotics-inspired scanpath model reveals the importance of uncertainty and semantic object cues for gaze guidance in dynamic scenes.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Downward gazing behavior after stroke can enhance postural control even in the absence of visual input.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Gaze Scanning on Mid-Block Sidewalks by Pedestrians With Homonymous Hemianopia With or Without Spatial Neglect.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Article
- Look at what I can do: Object affordances guide visual attention while speakers describe potential actions.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022Article
- Vision, cognition, and walking stability in young adults.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Dual-tasking impacts gait, cognitive performance, and gaze behavior during walking in a real-world environment in older adult fallers and non-fallers.Experimental gerontology · 2021Article
- Gazing down increases standing and walking postural steadiness.Royal Society open science · 2021Article
- Active vision in immersive, 360° real-world environments.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Studying the visual brain in its natural rhythm.NeuroImage · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of better eye and body tracking systems, and more flexible virtual environments have allowed more systematic exploration of natural vision and contributed a number of insights. In natural visually guided behaviour, humans make continuous sequences of sensory-motor decisions to satisfy current goals, and the role of vision is to provide the relevant information in order to achieve those goals. This paper reviews the factors that control gaze in natural visually guided actions such as locomotion, including the rewards and costs associated with the immediate behavioural goals, uncertainty about the state of the world and prior knowledge of the environment. These general features of human gaze control may inform the development of artificial systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.