ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2018
Evaluation of teachers training workshop at Kirkpatrick level 1 using retro-pre questionnaire.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reliability and validity of applying Kirkpatrick model for evaluating exercise rehabilitation program.Journal of exercise rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Promotion of training course on ICD-10 Poisoning coding : necessity to adopt preventive strategies.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Assessment of a training project of English as a media of instruction(EMI) using Kirkpatrick model.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Article
- The impact of a targeted education package on the knowledge, attitudes, and utilisation of patient reported outcome measures amongst chiropractors in Australia.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2022Article
- Evaluating the effectiveness of an online faculty development programme for nurse educators about remote teaching during COVID-19.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2021Article
- Implementation of a large-scale simulation-based cardiovascular clinical examination course for undergraduate medical students - a pilot study.BMC medical education · 2019Article
- The International Literature on Teaching Faculty Development in English-Language Journals: A Scoping Review and Recommendations for Core Topics.Journal of graduate medical education · 2019Article
- Evaluating the effect of an in-service training workshop on ICD-10 coding instructions of pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium for clinical coders.Journal of medicine and lifeArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTeacher training focusing on teaching learning methodologies, assessment tools, and approaches that motivate the teachers and enhance their confidence is one of the fundamental programs of faculty development. The objective of this study was to assess the self-reported perceived confidence of faculty members after participating in a basic teachers training workshop. METHODOLOGY: The retrospective post-then-pre design questionnaire was used for evaluating the faculty members' self-reported perceived confidence at Kirkpatrick level 1 (evaluation of reaction) after completing basic teachers training workshops. The self-reported perceived confidence on 30 statements were analyzed by 3 categories (not confident, confident, and highly confident) on a Likert scale.
resultsOut of 60 participants (18 in the 3rd and 21 each in the 4th and 5th teachers training workshops), 58 (96.67%) responded to all statements. The mean age of the participants was 34.14±5.15 years; 70.7% were male and 29.3% female. Overall, the self-reported perceived confidence level of the participants of the 3rd (pre-training median 57, post-training median 70,
conclusionOverall, the self-reported perceived confidence level of the participants was significantly increased after teachers training workshop.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.