Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29950782›Full record

ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2018

Occupation-based differences in shared perceptions of older resident needs within multidisciplinary care teams: a cross-sectional study of care workers, nurses, and therapists linked to older residents.

Tomoko Ohura, Takahiro Higashi, Tatsuro Ishizaki, Takeo Nakayama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tomoko OhuraDivision of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Care and Rehabilitation, Seijoh University: 2-172 Fukinodai, Tokai, Aichi 476-8588, Japan.
Takahiro HigashiDivision of Health Services Research, Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center, Japan.
Tatsuro IshizakiHuman Care Research Team, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Japan.
Takeo NakayamaDepartment of Health Informatics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[Purpose] To examine whether the needs of older individuals are commonly understood by multidisciplinary team members at elderly care facilities. [Subjects and Methods] A questionnaire survey with care workers, nurses, and therapists linked to residents and structured interviews with residents were conducted at eight facilities in Japan. The questionnaire comprised 25 items regarding basic activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), environment and lifestyle (EL), and emotion. [Results] The data of 88 residents (83.0% female, 86.4% aged ≥75 years) and 125 staff members (63 care workers, 36 nurses, and 26 therapists) were analyzed. Perceptions regarding the subjective needs of residents differed significantly by occupation with regard to pace of eating, pace of dressing, and freedom to brush at any time; shaving or putting on make-up; personal space, role performance, and health exercises; and feeling good. All three occupations underestimated the subjective needs of residents for household chores. [Conclusion] Staff members had insufficient understanding of the subjective needs of residents, with a tendency to underestimate IADL and EL needs. Perceived subjective needs also differed by occupation. Sharing the understanding of subjective needs of older individuals within multidisciplinary care teams is desired.

Indexed as

Care for older residentsMultidisciplinary care teamSubjective needs

Identifiers

PMID29950782
PMCPMC6016288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.