Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29950702›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2018

Hydrocarbon degradation and response of seafloor sediment bacterial community in the northern Gulf of Mexico to light Louisiana sweet crude oil.

Hernando P Bacosa, Deana L Erdner, Brad E Rosenheim, Prateek Shetty, Kiley W Seitz, Brett J Baker, Zhanfei Liu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 168 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparative Genomics, Transcriptome, and Prokaryotic Expression Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hernando P BacosaMarine Science Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Port Aransas, TX, 78373, USA. herbacs3001@gmail.com.
Deana L ErdnerMarine Science Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Port Aransas, TX, 78373, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1736-8835
Brad E RosenheimCollege of Marine Science, University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL, 33701, USA.
Prateek ShettyDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University East Lansing, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Kiley W SeitzMarine Science Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Port Aransas, TX, 78373, USA.
Brett J BakerMarine Science Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Port Aransas, TX, 78373, USA.
Zhanfei LiuMarine Science Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Port Aransas, TX, 78373, USA.
The University of Texas at Austin · USMichigan State University · USTexas A&M University at Galveston · USUniversity of South Florida St. Petersburg · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Deepwater Horizon (DWH) blowout resulted in the deposition to the seafloor of up to 4.9% of 200 million gallons of oil released into the Gulf of Mexico. The petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations near the wellhead were high immediately after the spill, but returned to background levels a few years after the spill. Microbial communities in the seafloor are thought to be responsible for the degradation of hydrocarbons, however, our knowledge is primarily based upon gene diversity surveys and hydrocarbon concentration in field sediment samples. Here, we investigated the oil degradation potential and changes in bacterial community by amending seafloor sediment collected near the DWH site with crude oil and both oil and Corexit dispersant. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were rapidly degraded during the first 30 days of incubation, while alkanes were degraded more slowly. With the degradation of hydrocarbons, the relative abundances of Colwelliaceae, Alteromonadaceae, Methylococales, Alcanivorax, Bacteriovorax, and Phaeobacter increased remarkably. However, the abundances of oil-degrading bacteria changed with oil chemistry. Colwelliaceae decreased with increasing oil degradation, whereas Alcanivorax and Methylococcales increased considerably. We assembled seven genomes from the metagenome, including ones belonging to Colwellia, Alteromonadaceae, Rhodobacteraceae, the newly reported genus Woeseia, and candidate phylum NC10, all of which possess a repertoire of genes for hydrocarbon degradation. Moreover, genes related to hydrocarbon degradation were highly enriched in the oiled treatment, suggesting that the hydrocarbons were biodegraded, and that the indigenous microflora have a remarkable potential for the natural attenuation of spilled oil in the deep-sea surface sediment.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalGeologic SedimentsGulf of AmericaLouisianaPetroleumPetroleum PollutionProteobacteriaWater Pollutants, ChemicalPetroleumWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID29950702
PMCPMC6154971
OpenAlexW2810421407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.