Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29950698›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Incentive motivation in pet dogs - preference for constant vs varied food rewards.

Annika Bremhorst, Sarah Bütler, Hanno Würbel, Stefanie Riemer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Development of Desirable Behaviors in Dog-Assisted Interventions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Where Do We Stand in the Domestic Dog (Frontiers in psychology · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Annika BremhorstDivision of Animal Welfare, DCR-VPHI, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Länggassstrasse 120, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Sarah BütlerDivision of Animal Welfare, DCR-VPHI, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Länggassstrasse 120, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Hanno WürbelDivision of Animal Welfare, DCR-VPHI, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Länggassstrasse 120, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2934-3010
Stefanie RiemerDivision of Animal Welfare, DCR-VPHI, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Länggassstrasse 120, 3012, Bern, Switzerland. riemer.stefanie@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8008-5291

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, there has been a move towards positive reinforcement using food rewards in animal training. By definition, rewards function as reinforcers if they increase or maintain the frequency of behaviour that they follow. However, in operant conditioning tasks animals frequently show systematic changes in performance - in particular a reduction in responding over time. One suggested strategy to avoid such performance decrements is to provide a variety of food rewards, rather than the same food reward in all trials. The enhancement of appetitive behaviour and consumption by reward variation is referred to as 'variety effect'. We investigated whether dogs preferred a variable or a constant food reward in a concurrent two-choice test. Of 16 dogs, six subjects showed a significant preference for the varied food reward and six for the constant food reward, while four dogs exhibited no significant preference for either option. At the group level, there was a significant effect of block: preference for the varied food reward increased across six blocks of ten trials each. Thus, although some individuals may prefer a single, favourite food reward in the short term, introducing variation in reward types may maintain dogs' motivation in operant tasks over a longer time period.

Indexed as

AnimalsAppetitive BehaviorConditioning, OperantDogsFemaleFoodMaleMotivationReinforcement, PsychologyReward

Identifiers

PMID29950698
PMCPMC6021384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.